Talk:KDE

Former good articleKDE was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 9, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted

Wikimedia section

Seems WMDE and KDE no longer share an office building?

https://osm.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=52.5032996%2C13.4087274%3B52.4984142%2C13.3810486#map=15/52.49975/13.39714

Arlo James Barnes 09:45, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Needs a HatNote re Lack of real citations

On Wiki, self-sourcing is not considered great. Here and there, one or two, fine, but:

  • Of 122 "REFs" 96 are to KDR.org; 26 are non-KDE.
  • 2 of the "non-KDE" are to a spanish-KDE site, so that's 24.
  • one of the 24 is to KDEnews.org, so that's 23.

There's something about RS, Reliable Source(s).

  • One Ref is to TheRegister
  • One Ref is to CIO Magazine
  • One apiece to Linux Magazine and to LinuxPro
  • TWO to ARS Technica
  • TWO are to NTVMSNBC (a spanish news source)

So an article that has 122 citations, and presumably at least half are important, i.e. would otherwise say CITATION NEEDED, this article needs a HatNote. Pi314m (talk) 01:36, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=KDE_Gear Jabberwoch (talk) 04:11, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]