This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Sports and Games This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance). England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Football: England / English non-league Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the English non-league task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Yorkshire Low‑importance Jackie Stamps is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please move the article to Jack Stamps 146.90.7.173 (talk) 20:21, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

East Staffordshire District Council completed a housing development in Winshill, close to Jackie's home, in 1990. The development consisted of two distinct areas and one of them was named in his memory. 2A00:23C6:249E:B901:9110:44B9:2D1:745A (talk) 08:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Date should be 1992, not 1990. 2A00:23C6:249E:B901:91C9:A356:B752:67DA (talk) 12:42, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jumping in before the GA review gets started. There are several references that are missing the |via= parameter, would be good to fix these before the review starts. Keith D (talk) 01:06, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jackie Stamps/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Bungle (talk · contribs) 17:21, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Lucfev (talk · contribs) 19:24, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Hello. I will be reviewing this one. Lucfev (talk) 19:24, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• This article is in good shape, considering the state it was in before your work on it. I have done a bit of copyediting, but the article seems to meet all of the criteria. There are no images but I don't believe it would be possible.
• I have done a spotcheck on the source, and source 3, 4, 13, 21, 24, 25, 28, 31, 33, 39, 42, 45, 56 and 59 all look good. Unfortunately I do not have access to the enfa page but I would assume it corroborates the article.
  • @Lucfev: Many thanks for deciding to review the article. It's nice to read that you also think it's in a much better condition than prior to my work on it. I am hopeful we can find a photo at some point as it's not out of the question for one to exist. I see you didn't advice upon any other further improvement suggestions, so trust that you believe the article is broad enough already in its coverage of the subject. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:36, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]