Talk:Iraqi insurgency (2003–2011)

Former featured articleIraqi insurgency (2003–2011) is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 1, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
June 14, 2005Featured article reviewKept
October 19, 2005Featured article reviewDemoted
Current status: Former featured article

Fallujah killings of April 2003

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallujah_killings_of_April_2003

This event is not mentioned on this page or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War

Fallujah killings of April 2003 ignited the insurgency. The US is as responsible for the insurgency as it is for the initial invasion of Iraq. It should be made clear. As it stands now, the insurgency is presented as uncaused. "Shit just happens."

That the insurgency was caused by gross incompetence on the part of the US does not negate responsibility. We know that the US had no clue beyond the invasion, other than being greeted as liberators and there would be streets named after Bush. But nobody bought that nonsense.

"Terrorism in iraq" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Terrorism in iraq. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 29#Terrorism in iraq until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thepharoah17 (talk) 07:53, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Iraqi terrorism" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Iraqi terrorism. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 29#Iraqi terrorism until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thepharoah17 (talk) 08:01, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Result

is the result correct? was it a victory for either side? or should we put stalemate? Ali36800p (talk) 18:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

term

A question, why is it called insurgency? Shouldn't it be called resistance since its against an occupational force and lasts exactly as long as the occupation? Perhaps insurgency is a more fitting term for the period after 2011? 185.89.234.7 (talk) 14:02, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:52, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Nationalism, Power, and Resistance in the modern Middle East

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2025 and 5 December 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bigevsmith (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Elphabaandgalinda.

— Assignment last updated by Elphabaandgalinda (talk) 15:27, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We should clarify what exactly is meant by "coalition failure to defeat insurgency"

Such a statement sounds like a victory, and yet the result of the conflict is listed as "inconclusive" in the infobox. Maybe we should change it to be something more specific like "insurgency continues, evolving into [next phase of conflict]" or "coalition failure to completely eliminate insurgency." QuisEstJoe (talk) 20:19, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]