Talk:Huwie Ishizaki

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 08:00, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that Huwie Ishizaki likes being naked and stated that he wanted to be naked forever if it is allowed?
Created by Miminity (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 7 past nominations.

Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 11:26, 3 February 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Comment: Not a review, but the article needs a thorough copyedit for grammar. I'll fix what I can, but no guarantees. Grumpylawnchair (talk) 05:31, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • After some copyedits by a couple of editors, I think this article is good to move forward. Article new enough, long enough, well-sourced, and blp compliant. QPQ done. Each hook is in the article and cited. My preferences are for ALT1 and ALT2, just for BLP's sake. A machine translation of the interview cited verifies both these hooks. Good to go. Tenpop421 (talk) 16:27, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Huwie Ishizaki/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Miminity (talk · contribs) 11:35, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: OmegaAOL (talk · contribs) 14:48, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·
  • The first thing I noticed were that a lot of the sources were Japanese. I had to use Google Translate for some of them. This is a non-issue.
  • The sentences seem a bit disjointed; that is, there are multiple short sentences (e.g. He debuted in July 2012 with his mini album Dai-san Wakusei Kōkyōkyoku. As of March 2025, he has released six full albums. He charted on Billboard Japan's Hot Lyricist and Composer in November 2021.) I would suggest that you improve this; however, it is not a criterion for GA.
  • The lead does not have citations and accurately summarizes the article content, which is in accordance with MoS:Lead. The inclusion of the Japanese and Hepburn names is also nice.
  • The Early life section seems small, but then again there does not seem to be much available content regarding his early life on the Web.
  • The rest of the Career section is suitably standard, containing a timeline of his discography and performances, and his band history. Nothing to add here.
  • There seems to be a lot of information on his career and not much else. Then again, sources corroborate this.
  • I considered merging the Personal life and Early life sections, but decided against it as this format seems the best already.
  • My only gripe is that there are so many redlinks, but this is not a disqualifier for GA or even FA. It is only standard given that the subject of interest is Japanese.
  • I did some copyediting to clean up the Career section and add some links. Very minor work, though. The section is already pretty decent.
  • I would recommend that you use commas to demarcate song titles, and use "the (media)", and not "his (media)", when referring to one of his new releases.
  • There were some things that hadn't been linked, but I cleaned up most of them. For future reference, remember to link anything you think an average person, with no context, wouldn't know about,
  • As for the checks: Grammar and MoS are good, there are plenty of citations and no WP:OR, no copyvio, 3a seems sparse, but I can't find sources to add to it, so it passes, 3b pass, 4, 5, and 6 pass.
  • I congratulate the nominator on this good article. Good job, nominator.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.