Talk:Hometown Village
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 18:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- ... that Hometown Village (pictured) is a community of Sakhalin Koreans who were finally allowed to return to South Korea after the Japanese colonial period and the dissolution of the Soviet Union? Source: [1]
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Yun Hai
- Comment: Image is optional
Created by Toobigtokale (talk). Self-nominated at 02:48, 14 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Hometown Village; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
The article was created on January 14 and nominated on the same day. Its length is 5,200 characters, which is well over the requirement. The hook is supported by reliable sources and is reasonably interesting. Good to go. --Moscow Connection (talk) 04:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Good Article nom
Note that I'm the creator of this article (toobigtokale) and also the nominator. See my user page for explanation of why I have another account seefooddiet (talk) 01:40, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Hometown Village/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Seefooddiet (talk · contribs) 01:40, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: LastJabberwocky (talk · contribs) 13:01, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I searched for Russian-related nominations and older nominations, and found just that! As a side note, I'm a little concerned whether Hometown Village have enough information for a standalone article outside of Sakhalin Koreans. But, as I see it, it would be difficult to merge the village with Sakhalin Koreans, and thus this article is justified. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 13:01, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Copyright
copyvios almost doesn't pick up anything, as most of the sources are Korean. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 13:01, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Refs and sources, and images
- Should we merge two "99% Invisible" footnotes into one? They both refer to one episode.
- Done grapesurgeon (seefooddiet) (talk) 01:28, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- All pictures are justified.
- I think you should change "Winter 2024" to "Early 2024" per MOS:SEASON.
- Done grapesurgeon (seefooddiet) (talk) 01:28, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- I think you should change "Winter 2024" to "Early 2024" per MOS:SEASON.
Prose
Iron Curtain can be turned into Asia-specific term I have just learned, bamboo curtain.
- I think maybe this could be seen as OR? Both given sources use the term "iron curtain"; I think better to just use the terms they use. grapesurgeon (seefooddiet) (talk) 01:28, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- Fair enough! —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 08:02, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
I think you should rephrase this pretty strong statement: "they were elderly and wished to die in their homeland
" --> "...and, according to Viktoriya Bya (editor of Sakhalin's Korean-language newspaper), they wanted to go to their homeland to die.
"
- Used that wording with slight modification. grapesurgeon (seefooddiet) (talk) 01:28, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
"The enclave is the subject of Episode 497 of the podcast 99% Invisible.
" This doesn't seem well-placed in the "description" section. As the podcast is already mentioned as a reference, I think we can remove this sentence.
- removed grapesurgeon (seefooddiet) (talk) 01:28, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
- @LastJabberwocky: Hello, thank you for the review! I think I got everything grapesurgeon (seefooddiet) (talk) 01:28, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your work, losing my review! —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 08:02, 23 July 2025 (UTC)