Talk:Edward W. Gantt

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Edward W. Gantt/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 04:45, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 08:52, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will review, comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 08:52, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


What an interest character; the change from being a slave owner prewar to being somewhat of an advocate for freed slaves afterwards is quite jarring!

Lead

  • Reads OK

Biography

Other stuff

  • No spot checks done, happy to AGF on the sourcing given nominator's history
Done some checks using the online source, over half a dozen cites reviewed and verified. Zawed (talk) 08:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sources themselves look reliable, being mostly university presses
  • Earwig tool identifies the Finley article on the Encyclopedia of Arkansas as having 24% similarity. Reviewing this, it looks to be based mostly on common terms e.g. 1850 Nashville Convention and titles of shared sources.
  • Image tag OK
  • No dupe links

That's it for me. Zawed (talk) 06:58, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for taking several days to get to this. I hope to be able to address these tomorrow. Hog Farm Talk 00:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Zawed: - Thanks for the review! I have replied above to all of these. Since I believe spot-checking is now required for GA reviews, I can provide quotes from the sourced. Hog Farm Talk 00:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Passing this one as GA, as I believe that it meets the necessary criteria. Zawed (talk) 08:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hilst talk 21:33, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Hog Farm (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 259 past nominations.

Launchballer 13:44, 23 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article promoted to GA on 22 November; article is cited inline throughout to reliable sources; sources are mostly offline but I found no overly close paraphrasing form the ones I could access; hook fact is interesting, stated in article, it is cited offline but checks out in the Encyclopedia of Arkansas source; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks fine to me - Dumelow (talk) 18:03, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dumelow, the article can be accessed through the Wikipedia Library at https://muse-jhu-edu.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/pub/189/edited_volume/chapter/2024970 TarnishedPathtalk 01:34, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Might be worthwhile adding that link to the article rather than just here - Dumelow (talk) 07:44, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done TarnishedPathtalk 08:43, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]