Talk:Ashley Null

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 02:42, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that Olympic team chaplain Ashley Null credits his work counseling elite athletes on performance-based anxiety to his scholarly research on the Protestant Reformation?
  • Reviewed: 0
Created by Dclemens1971 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:46, 10 February 2025 (UTC).[reply]


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Looks great to me, but welcome a second opinion given this is my first ever review. The only question I have is whether the Reformation referenced in the hook should be Protestant Reformation or English Reformation (Null’s specialty and referenced earlier in the interview). Since the source appears to be referring to the broader movement, I think Protestant Reformation is correct but welcome a second opinion. Butterdiplomat (talk) 15:12, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article, created on 5 Feb, is new enough, long enough, well-sourced, with no copyvio or blp violations apparent to me. No QPQ needed. @Butterdiplomat: I agree, Protestant Reformation seems right. However, @Dclemens1971: there's nothing about performance-based anxiety in the citation, so we'd have to change the hook to:
ALT1: ... that Olympic team chaplain Ashley Null credits his work counseling elite athletes to his scholarly research on the Protestant Reformation?
Otherwise, good to go. Best, Tenpop421 (talk) 16:08, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm good with the alternate hook, Tenpop421. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:45, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, good to go. Tenpop421 (talk) 14:47, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


GA review

Passed. Icepinner 08:51, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ashley Null/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Dclemens1971 (talk · contribs) 14:51, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Icepinner (talk · contribs) 14:04, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Not very experienced with BLPs or religion, but I'll try my best. Icepinner 14:04, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Finished with this review. Feel free to object to any comments. Icepinner 14:04, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Icepinner Thanks, will review in greater depth and reply within the next day or two. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:11, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Early life and education

Scholarship

Cranmer

Anglicanism

Clerical career

Image

Sources

Spot-check

@Icepinner: I've replied to your comments above and made some edits to the article. Thank you for the review and let me know if you have other questions/comments! Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:40, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm satisfied that the nomination meets the GAN criteria and shall accordingly pass the article. Congrats! This reminds me, I need to catch up with the drive... Icepinner 08:45, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ashley_Null