Your feedback is requested at Talk:Winnipeg on a "History and geography" request for comment, and at Talk:List of pro-Russian political parties on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 23:42, 7 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ashkenazi Jews on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 12:30, 8 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cascadia movement on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 04:30, 21 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carbon capture and storage in Argentina, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carbon capture was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 22 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi guninvalid. I wanted to let you know that I removed the CSD tag you placed on the above draft. It doesn't look that promotional to me, and the draft being unsourced isn't a valid reason to speedy delete it, either. Unsourced BLPs are regularly deleted at MFD, though, so I nominated it there. You're welcome to participate at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Tiago Martinez. Chess enjoyer (talk) 01:30, 23 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Syria on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 03:31, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Template:Please do not remove past decline templates has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:39, 28 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

What jokes did you end up considering for April Fools Day this year? Carson004 (talk) 01:40, 1 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I wrote that in my list of April Fools ideas a few months ago. I've forgotten exactly which ideas I considered by now unfortunately. guninvalid (talk) 03:03, 5 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Battle of Vågen on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 18:30, 7 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your feedback is requested at Talk:United States Semiquincentennial on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 00:31, 12 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Zionism on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 18:31, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2026 Iran war on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 20:30, 19 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

• Recordkeeping note: This topic relates to Wikipedia talk:Writing articles with large language models#My thoughts.

It is difficult to apprehend that a wikipedia editor would undertake to close an informal discussion on a talk page that they had no involvement in personally simply because you interpreted people's voluntary statements of their opinions as a time-waste. The AI discussion was intelligent and remains ripe; it is not fit for archival or termination at the present time (or likely any time soon). This is censorship if we have no public forum on here anymore to talk through these issues. You would do well to refrain from ending good-faith informal discussions on relevant topics and rendering any such further dialogue impossible by closing unilaterally the discussion forum in which we had been engaging in interesting and wide-ranging dialogue. I will ask that you willingly unarchive the discussion you closed out, as it had remained ripe and was neither over nor warranting of cloture. Ballardy Talk Page 22:04, 24 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

WP:NOTFORUM is a policy. You are free to discuss AI and how it works as you please, but Wikipedia is not the place to have such a discussion. A discussion being voluntary does not make it appropriate for Wikipedia. guninvalid (talk) 23:09, 24 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

We were not having just any abstract discussion on AI. Our discussion pertained directly to a Wikipedia policy, so let’s be clear about that. Ballardy Talk Page 23:12, 24 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I saw you deleted my draft. To clear things up I wasn't trying to make it public, it was a test draft for personal benefit. I was however trying to move it to my sandbox as it was originally overwritten on a failed draft, because I was lazy lol. I do ask you please restore it under my sandbox, and send me the hyperlink because I suck at finding stuff lol Sarranidian (talk) 15:05, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, @Sarranidian! I'm particularly picky about my talk page so I've moved your comment down here, hope you don't mind. I saw this earlier today and I was about to move your comment to User talk:BusterD, but it seems you've already asked them, which is great. In general, for something like this, your sandbox is a better place to tinker. I nominated your article for deletion from draftspace because there draftspace is specifically for the WP:Articles for creation process, and your draft stood zero chance of becoming an article. But in your sandbox, as long as you're not being disruptive, for the most part, you can experiment unbothered. Thanks, and happy editing! guninvalid (talk) 07:47, 28 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

someone had moved it into drafts because I forgot a redirect even though the topics had no correlation tho lol. but yeah im gonna just redo it in my sandbox, it wasn't that much anyways. Anyways have a good day! Sarranidian (talk) 10:42, 28 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Sorry to bother you again, but could you double check my sandbox "Kingdom of Farota" under my profile to see if it is in the right spot. If not could you please help me move it without deleting it. Thank you! Sarranidian (talk) 11:30, 28 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Restore Britain on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 21:32, 28 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Linked up i.e and .....Pages that link to "Wikipedia:Wikipedia is written by humans, for humans" Moxy🍁 05:44, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Nice indeed! Thanks. guninvalid (talk) 06:54, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

As in Draft:Anvil DB. I understand the frustration reviewers feel. But let's avoid language which might potentially complicate what is otherwise a straightforward process. Thanks for your eyes. When I see sigs of longtime taggers, it makes my process a bit less stressful. BusterD (talk) 11:08, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I tried moving User:ARandomCatalyst/674 (organisation) to my user space. ARandomCatalyst (talk) 02:33, 30 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Zionism on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 18:31, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

not again guninvalid (talk) 02:42, 5 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Guninvalid. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Guninvalid/testpage, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:08, 5 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of Palestinians on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 10:30, 8 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Moved to User talk:Jimfbleak

Moved comments to deleting admin's talkpage. guninvalid (talk) 19:45, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 22:30, 22 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

	This LLM-generated text has been collapsed and should be excluded from assessments of consensus.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Hi Guninvalid, I am contesting the G11 speedy deletion nomination on Draft:Presolv360. The current draft version contains no promotional language and is sourced to independent reliable sources. I am a disclosed paid editor per WP:PAID on User:Legalwiki123. The draft has been substantially rewritten multiple times following AfC reviewer feedback. I respectfully request you review the current version before proceeding with deletion. Legalwiki123 (talk) 09:26, 27 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please contact the deleting administrator. guninvalid (talk) 22:01, 27 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your feedback is requested at Category talk:19th-century Irish scholars on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 16:31, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is What I am requesting. —In solidarity with Wiki Workers United · ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email) 08:41, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Discussion created but not notified by ArchiveEditor01. —In solidarity with Wiki Workers United · ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email) 08:41, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hey there, User:Guninvalid! Sorry to bother you, but I wanted to follow up on your interest in my request on the Verkada Talk page. I've listed a few extra sources for your review. If you can find the time, I would really appreciate it. Thanks! Seakittea (talk) 18:40, 17 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

following up on oh gods don't remind me of my job guninvalid (talk) 06:05, 18 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

sleeping fox,

⠀⠀⠀⠀ .n 10:00, 28 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

fennec guninvalid (talk) 20:30, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Just curious, what is it about this that made you think it was LLM? ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 20:27, 9 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Canned header message, canned sign off, duplicating the entire paragraph, random bolding, and not understanding notability. I can't be certain but it smells rather Claude. I use Claude for my job and I have a lot of experience reading Claude output. Of course, the temp account can dispute and reopen if they so wish, but they should probably read WP:Help, I've been accused of using AI! first. guninvalid (talk) 21:46, 9 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2026 Iran war on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 21:31, 9 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

• KristianVBR (talk · contribs)
  • Viberate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Viberate (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, I'm writing as my draft for Wiki page for company Viberate was again declined, deemed written by AI. This second try was written by a human copywriter freelancer, hired to create the article, based on my brief and my preparation of all the sources relevant for the Wikipedia article. Here was only human work, as in the first try, where based on all the things gathered manually I used AI so that the article would look professional and adhere to Wikipedia rules. As I respect that the articles must be human written I hired a (human) copywriter to do the job. Specifically when collaborating with the copywriter he assured that it is humanly written by him. I can provide proof of communication in private if needed.

What must be now done for the article to be accepted, so I know how to proceed. Thank you for understanding.

Kind regards, Kristian/Viberate

KristianVBR (talk) 19:00, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello @KristianVBR. Several problems.

1. Please do not use LLMs to talk for you, either. We want to hear from you, not Gemini (or Claude or ChatGPT or whichever model you're using).

2. I acknowledge that I cannot be certain whether your draft was actually LLM generated or not. That being said, even if it is written from scratch by a human copywriter — and I'd advise you to verify your copywriter's writing process —, there are still other issues with the draft.

3. Some of your sources are dead links which is a serious sign of AI generation Finance (Slovenia) seems like a reliable source, but it doesn't seem to be about Viberate or music at all, at least based on the machine translation I scrolled through. One of your MBW sources is an interview with UMEK, meaning it does not establish notability. The other MBW source covering your data publication however is fine, as it is based on your reporting rather than simply being your reporting, so it counts as secondary and reliable. But you would need 2-3 other reliable sources before a draft can be accepted.

4. Unless you, Kristian, are your copywriter, please ask your copywriter to use a separate Wikipedia account and do not simply paste their words on their behalf. It is prohibited for multiple people to operate one Wikipedia account.

5. Please ask your copywriter to write your article from scratch. There are other tells of AI in your draft and it's likely that your copywriter included those through osmosis, which tells me they don't understand how to write a Wikipedia article. Generally speaking, it is best to construct a new Wikipedia article backwards starting with sources, rather than writing content and sourcing later. Give your copywriter your sources and then let them write the article from scratch, or, better yet, wait for your company to become notable enough for someone without a COI to finally take an interest.

6. Finally, please read WP: Autobiographies. There are reasons why you might not even want a Wikipedia article. You do not own your Wikipedia page, and any controversy that is made public about your company is likely to be added there and stay there indefinitely. If you tried to remove it, you would likely see fierce resistance and end up being blocked from editing. guninvalid (talk) 23:13, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello!

Thank you very much for your reply and time taken to review my comment. It is of course written by me, now worries here. I'll take into account what you suggested - I did start with collecting sources, so I'll start again this way as well.

Re teh sources - are the Digital Music News sources and other sources such as Dancing astronaut, IQ magazine, CNN, EDM.com,... also good? I've pulled as much as I can in my table of sources and will do another try, hopefully this time it will be accepted. Thanks again!

Kind regards,

Kristian KristianVBR (talk) 08:23, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roberto Serrano, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fortune was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:12, 12 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

If you think you can improve the Marie Curie page please do so. Don't accuse me of a crime I did not commit. Johnjbarton (talk) 02:55, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Civility is part of Wikipedia's code of conduct. Johnjbarton (talk) 15:32, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Federal subjects of Russia on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 18:31, 23 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

There is a clear misunderstanding regarding the count of Cascades ALC-42E units. The claim of a third unit stems from misinterpreting factory test sightings of Amtrak #70004.

Locomotive #70004 is built and painted for standard Amtrak Phase VII Northeast Regional / NEC services. Recent factory updates confirm it was temporarily coupled to a Cascades trainset on the test track purely to provide head-end power (HEP) during factory diagnostics. It is not part of the Amtrak Cascades order allocation. https://www.reddit.com/r/trains/comments/1utyz4o/alc42e_with_park_avenue_escape_windscreen/

The true Cascades-assigned locomotive count remains at exactly 2 units (#70001 and #70002). Relying on a fan blog (https://www.on-track-on-line.com/amtkrinf-airo.shtml) that misidentifies an NEC locomotive as a Cascades unit violates WP:RS. I am expecting you to correct the Cascades ALC42E unit count to 2 and find an alternate site that states the right info to maintain factual accuracy." Trimetwes fan1003 (talk) 19:30, 23 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Magazine (firearms) on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 20:30, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Despite what my username may suggest, I have no interest in this question lol guninvalid (talk) 21:05, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Joy General Aviation Flight 6005: Translated from Chinese, modifications were made. Ohok12 (talk) 09:23, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Guninvalid. I have submitted again the draft of Shen Xiaoting, in which I have corrected all the issues of LLM that you have mentioned previously. I'd like you to take a look at it again if you can. Thank you! Techgamer534 (talk) 18:55, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Did you correct your llm by rewriting it from scratch from the sources? guninvalid (talk) 19:09, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Guninvalid. Yes, I took the entire text, pasted it into a document on my personal computer (to avoid any errors), rewrote several parts in my own words (and also modified the reference's names), and finally, pasted the finished text into the draft. I think it looks good this time, and I hope it can actually be published now. Thanks for your reply. Greetings. Techgamer534 (talk) 21:42, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Thought I should mention that Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red's 1day1woman initiative may be of interest to you! Since you just created an article on a woman Froglord (Finnfrog99) (talk) 14:20, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Egya Ahor. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text and unreliable reliable references (such as wikipedia itself) and formality/npov issues. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Sulfurboy (talk) 05:53, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

FYI, I moved this back to draftspace that you accepted out of AfC as it's almost entirely machine generated, sources wikipedia, and has some pretty concerning tone and NPOV issues. Sulfurboy (talk) 05:54, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

I had a feeling once I actually looked at the revision history, but that was only after I had already accepted it. I figured once I accepted it, it's out of my hands at least in the short term. Thanks for catching that. guninvalid (talk) 06:20, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Mistakes happen. I make them too. I had an accepted article draftified for a mistake I made just two days ago. Maybe in the future, if you do start to have doubts after accepting, either hit it with maintenance tags, or ask another reviewer on their talk page their thoughts. Either way, thanks for your help with AfC reviewing. Sulfurboy (talk) 06:38, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Project Panama, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 07:06, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

hey thanks lol guninvalid (talk) 07:08, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Guninvalid. I have submitted the draft of Huening Bahiyyih, in which I have made some improvements. I have significantly revised this draft to establish individual notability (WP:MUSIC) through extensive coverage in independent, reliable sources such as DAZED Korea and GQ Korea. The article now relies exclusively on high-quality third-party references (for example, NME, Korea JoongAng Daily, etc.), adheres to a strictly neutral and encyclopedic tone devoid of promotional language, and follows all technical formatting guidelines. I'd like you to take a look at it if you can. Thank you! Techgamer534 (talk) 20:46, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply