The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Ahmed Muiz → Mohamed Muizzu  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

His name is Mohamed Muizzu which makes this redirect inaccurate since he never went by "Ahmed Muiz". Unilandofma^{(Talk to me!)} 21:51, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:36, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• DVSM → Fuligo septica  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Apparently an abbreviation for dog vomit slime mold, but that isn't something that is commonly abbreviated to DVSM. It was linked from J. S. Steward (I've just removed the link there) where it apparently stands for Diploma in Veterinary State Medicine. There are other things with this abbreviation or sequence of letters could represent: a Swedish record label, DVSM records; an Australian charity, Domestic Violence Service Management, but I'm not sure that any of them are notable. Could be a disambiguation page if anything is notable, but I think the redirect should probably be deleted. Plantdrew (talk) 21:16, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Plantdrew's arguments jengod (talk) 21:20, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. First 10 pages of google yielded nothing about Dog Vomit Slime Mold, but all three other results came up. Maybe Diploma in Veterinary State Medicine is notable, but from what I can see, the other two aren't Plant🌱man (talk) 21:31, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the above. It's used a few times on en.wp as postnominals which usually merit a blue link, but we don't have any relevant content I can find. In addition to that, the German Wikipedia has an article about the de:Dachverband der Studierenden der Musikwissenschaften (google translates that as "German Association of Musicology Students") but we don't have any content in English. Thryduulf (talk) 22:20, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:36, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Jay 💬 19:53, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Orabueze → Biafra Referendum#Restoration declaration  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

In addition to this section mentioning Ngozi Orabueze, we also have Florence Orabueze. Not sure if it is better to retarget to Florence, delete, or disambiguate, but this target is clearly inappropriate. Thoughts? Rusalkii (talk) 22:02, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:26, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Listify as a {{surname}}. jlwoodwa (talk) 21:36, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there a primary topic?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 20:39, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jay When I looked up "Orabueze" on Google I got a number of different search results, some related to Florence, some related to Ngozi, some not even related to a Wikipedia topic at all. I don't think there is a primary topic, so listify/disambiguate. Plant🌱man (talk) 20:57, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 15:39, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:PADEMELONSWikipedia:PADEMELONS → Wikipedia:Large_language_models#Original_research_and_"hallucinations"  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Delete as not explained at destination. While I found the in-joke viewing page history then searching, others may find this WP:RASTONISHing. This shortcut was never used by editors besides its creator and unnecessarily uses up a potential shortcut seeing the shorter WP:AIFAIL already exists. 173.206.110.217 (talk) 07:18, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Creator) meh. Maybe it'll get used in the future, maybe it won't. That said, I don't find the WP:RASTONISH argument very convincing, since a silly title like WP:PADEMELONS could point anywhere. Cremastra (talk) 13:32, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but include some mention of the exchange somewhere in the "demonstrations" section to make it a bit more obvious. It's an obscure internal shortcut that the public won't see, it's not doing enough harm to worry about deleting BugGhost 🦗👻 15:21, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should we move the anchor down, retarget, or add the quote to the current section? (same IP editor) 173.206.105.221 (talk) 23:27, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:00, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the target talk.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 06:18, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Veverve (talk) 22:08, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and include mentions of the exchange somewhere in the "demonstrations" section to avoid WP:RASTONISH User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 10:08, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

let's run this little program i made up in 5 minutes yesterday as a safe alternative to thinking, i'm sure it's perfectly functional

if (HasMention = true) {

run (wp.VoteKeep);

} else {

run (wp.VoteDelete);

} end

though i am admittedly a little opposed to actually adding that mention without a redirect like wp:goosechase to go along with it consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 14:45, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plant🌱man (talk) 16:10, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment @Bugghost @Someone-123-321 I have added mentions of this in the target area of the redirect and the "Demonstrations" section so that WP:RASTONISH is now completely avoided. I personally don't think we need to link the discussion in the main target section, however if you think so I won't mind adding it TNM101 (chat) 17:21, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  then per my foolproof program, that means keep consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 22:01, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, since the essay now includes a mention of this shortcut. Xoontor (talk) 04:49, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to American Eclipse. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:06, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Greatest American EclipseGreatest American Eclipse → Solar eclipse of April 8, 2024  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Vague definition, everyone defined different eclipse as its own "Greatest American Eclipse" A1Cafel (talk) 09:38, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment the primary topic when searching for this exact phrase and excluding Wikipedia is the Solar eclipse of August 12, 2045. Thryduulf (talk) 14:53, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to the American Eclipse disambiguation where several candidates are listed. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:08, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @Tavix Should we list the 2045 eclipse at the dab page? From what I can see online, it is called “the Greatest American Eclipse” by many sources. E.g. here. Plant🌱man (talk) 15:18, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why not. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:22, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I shall do that now. Plant🌱man (talk) 15:23, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Or this, or this Plant🌱man (talk) 15:23, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to American Eclipse per Tavix. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:09, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate "Great American Eclipse" has been used multiple times, and this could be a viable search term for that. 'Greatest' also can refer to some paleo eclipse over the landmass where America sits currently, which would be different from the future one. -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 04:05, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to American Eclipse. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:05, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Great American Total Solar EclipseGreat American Total Solar Eclipse → Solar eclipse of April 8, 2024  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Ambitious, at least the August 2017 solar eclipse was also a total solar eclipse over America A1Cafel (talk) 09:37, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This exact phrase is used almost equally about the 2017 and 2024 eclipses, and looking deeper many of the hits are actually for things like "a great American total solar eclipse" or "the great American total solar eclipse of 2024" indicating that there is no single agreed upon eclipse that was the great one. Thryduulf (talk) 14:56, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to the American Eclipse disambiguation where both are listed. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:07, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to American Eclipse per Tavix. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:09, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to American Eclipse per Tavix. --Lenticel ^(talk) 09:12, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• disambiguate apart from the last two, several other historical eclipses were also so called -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 04:06, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 12:31, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Sambucha → Shoenice#Biography  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This currently redirects to a section at Shoenice#Biography; however, I believe it is unsuitable for that target. Sambucha is an independent Youtube channel with 9mln subscribers, and is more than just Shoenice, where he only has a trivial mention: "In 2024, Shoenice gained further recognition for his comedic talents through a personalized video message created for YouTuber Sambucha on the Cameo platform." However, after looking online for sources, I don't believe Sambucha has WP:SIGCOV, and most of the sources at Draft:Sambucha are also pretty unreliable (9 of the 13 sources were Social media - Reddit, Youtube, Instagram - and the rest were inaccessible to me). Therefore, I propose to delete this redirect. Plant🌱man (talk) 09:10, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: The "trivial mention" was removed from the target a day after the nomination. Jay 💬 11:33, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as not mentioned anywhere. Draft:Sambucha exists but has been repeatedly declined. Thryduulf (talk) 12:04, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . TheSandDoctor ^Talk 05:53, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Thankachan Emmanuel → Anu Emmanuel  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

He is a producer of multiple films and has links incoming from multiple articles. Redirecting this to his daughter's article, which does not provide additional information, is not optimal. Suggest deletion, but not redlinking, as it was BLARd with reason "no independent notability". Jay 💬 07:33, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and get rid of all incoming links to Thankachan Emmanuel. I could not find any significant coverage when I looked up his name online. Also, as stated in the nomination, he only has a trivial mention in his daughter's article (one sentence, to be exact). Plant🌱man (talk) 07:59, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at some of the sources listed in his movies. Now, to be clear I didn't look through all of them, but from what I could see, they only had at most a passing mention of him; some didn't even mention him at all. This seems to be a clear WP:BFDI. Plant🌱man (talk) 08:14, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Computer Russification. Jay 💬 05:57, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Russian language and computersRussian language and computers → JCUKEN  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Russian language and computers should discuss about the implementation of Russian language on computers, instead of redirecting to the not very related keyboard layout. Remove the redirect now, alternatively maybe move to draft namespace for improvement? HaydenWong (talk) 05:57, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:XY BugGhost 🦗👻 09:22, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Would also be fine with Thryduulf's Computer Russification suggestion. BugGhost 🦗👻 10:06, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Computer Russification. This is not an XY situation, the current target is just a narrow subtopic of the broad topic indicated by the search them. My proposed target is far from the greatest article we have, but it is directly related to the whole search term and includes some useful see-alsos. Thryduulf (talk) 15:01, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Computer Russification per Thryduulf. Paprikaiser (talk) 21:31, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Then move Computer Russification to Russian language and computers and maybe extend the topic? HaydenWong (talk) 01:34, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia:Open proxies noticeboard. Jay 💬 05:53, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:OPNWikipedia:OPN → Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Operation Normandy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Currently WP:OPN redirects to Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Operation Normandy which seems to be a less obvious target than Wikipedia:Open proxies noticeboard. I propose we retarget WP:OPN to Wikipedia:Open proxies noticeboard. — Naomi Amethyst 05:04, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Support retarget per nom. Nobody (talk) 06:09, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 09:13, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per nom; had the same idea myself. Elli (talk | contribs) 15:54, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to False statement. Jay 💬 05:02, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• False statementsFalse statements → Making false statements  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Retarget to False statement; no good reason for the plural-singular diff here. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:56, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget as standard {{r from plural}} Plant🌱man (talk) 04:18, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per nom and tag as {{r from plural}} --Lenticel ^(talk) 09:13, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 05:13, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Elimination Chamber: Торонто → Elimination Chamber: Toronto  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Russian (or any other language which uses Cyrillic) doesn't have any affinity with this tournament. Rusalkii (talk) 03:49, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete who would be looking for this? Plant🌱man (talk) 04:18, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Even if there were a reason to use Cyrillic, why would anyone mix Latin and Cyrillic scripts like this? Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 10:37, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Caeciliusinhorto It's not actually that uncommon in Russian to write a title or other proper noun in Latin script and then familiar words in Cyrillic, so this may parse as [Weird Foreign Title]: Toronto. It's a pretty weird usage and lacks WP:AFFINITY, so I nominated it, but not completely insane. There's four uses of this in the wild. Rusalkii (talk) 19:58, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Participants agree with the nomination rationale that the term is ambiguous, and the Polynomial target is not optimal. Disambiguation as well as deletion have been suggested. Jay 💬 04:10, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• RelightingRelighting → Polynomial texture mapping  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Could also refer to Flameout#Engine restart, for instance. 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:11, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• No opinion. I see a lack of internal and external "research". Relighting is linked from 3 pages for just that meaning; one was a REDLINK from 2013 until 2021. (See Pages that link to "Relighting".) Relighting could refer to RE-computer graphics lighting or some kind of RE-illumination. Relighting could be RE-ignition, but that's hardly a big topic. Engine relight redirects to [Flameout#Engine restart]. Relighting could be REPEAT fire lighting (fire making) after it goes out. How about Rocket engine restart (a redirect to [Rocket engine]). Relight My Fire (album)? RE-[lit]? Why nominate it for discussion? If relighting has other notable meanings, just be bold and make it a disambiguation page! -A876 (talk) 20:01, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and place a hatnote on the Polynomial texture mapping page, because it seems that said article fits more into such. Justjourney (talk) 23:18, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:46, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plant🌱man (talk) 03:07, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Ambiguous term not discussed with enough substance at the target to warrant a redirect. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:50, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate relighting a flame, restarting an engine, etc. -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 03:32, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Refine to #Electoral history. Jay 💬 05:49, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Electoral history of Hanuman BeniwalElectoral history of Hanuman Beniwal → Hanuman Beniwal  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Delete, as per WP:GNG, Electoral history of Hanuman Beniwal is already merged with the redirected article Hanuman Beniwal. Unnecessary redirect. — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 10:44, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per {{R from merge}}. GNG is a notability guideline and thus irrelevant to redirects. When content is merged we very nearly always keep the resulting redirect both for attribution purposes and to ensure that people can find the content that has been merged. Thryduulf (talk) 14:50, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plant🌱man (talk) 03:07, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Refine to Hanuman Beniwal#Electoral history per Thryduulf: no policy-backed reason has been provided for deletion and WP:RFD#K4 applies as it was still getting regular views between the merge and the nomination. Randi🦋^Talk_Contribs 17:20, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) RanDom 404 (talk) 01:12, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• User:WikiRedactor/So Random!User:WikiRedactor/So Random! → So Random!  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Probably not a needed redirect. RanDom 404 (talk) 00:19, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep redirects from user subpages are very nearly always completely harmless and should not be deleted without either evidence there is something actively harmful that only deletion can fix or a request from the user concerned. Additionally, "not needed" is never a reason on it's own to delete a redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 00:33, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 03:39, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• The Lone Ranger (2013 film project)The Lone Ranger (2013 film project) → The Lone Ranger (2013 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Was useful at one point but by this time it probably is not a likely search term. RanDom 404 (talk) 00:18, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Seems reasonable to me. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:50, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as a redirect that is still relevant to the target. Perhaps refine to #Production where it discusses the "project" side of things more. Plant🌱man (talk) 05:38, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep old redirect, unambiguous. No need to break links just because this would be a slightly weird usage now. Weekly oppose retargetting, but no strong feelings either way. Rusalkii (talk) 20:01, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:38, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) RanDom 404 (talk) 01:12, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• User:68DANNY2/So Random!User:68DANNY2/So Random! → So Random!  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not a needed redirect. RanDom 404 (talk) 00:18, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep redirects from user subpages are very nearly always completely harmless and should not be deleted without either evidence there is something actively harmful that only deletion can fix or a request from the user concerned. Additionally, "not needed" is never a reason on it's own to delete a redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 00:33, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).