The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was Delete. -- Longhair\^talk 23:20, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

St. Gregory the Great Primary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable Catholic primary school. Has done nothing spectacular. Fails WP:N, WP:CORP & WP:ORG. Twenty Years 04:38, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. —Twenty Years 04:39, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and no assertion of notability--Victor falk 10:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Arnzy (talk · contribs) 13:13, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- --Rrburke^(talk) 13:52, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. CRGreathouse (t | c) 15:27, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - lots of other Primary School articles exist. Should AfD be the appropriate response? Onnaghar talk.review 16:02, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, unless a speedy deletion is appropriate. CRGreathouse (t | c) 16:27, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Not all primary schools are NN, but most of the are. Twenty Years 08:52, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• In those few cases the AfD will properly fail, I'm sure. CRGreathouse (t | c) 22:05, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as nn school. Eusebeus 18:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Keb25 00:43, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. —Signed by KoЯnfan71 ^{My Talk} _{Sign Here!} 00:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Worth a mention in the article on Doncaster, Victoria but not as a standalone article. Capitalistroadster 03:34, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Doesn't pass notability standards. • Lawrence Cohen 06:15, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.