The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 18:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redlands Adventist Academy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

This stub for a non-notable private academy fails all tests of notability, including any version of WP:SCHOOL or WP:CORP. wikipediatrix 17:28, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• delete Is up since June and has not included any noticeability since Arnoutf 17:55, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I know anecdotal evidence isn't really helpful, but I'm originally from this area, and I've never heard of this school. Elcda0 21:34, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Delete School's founding in 1901 would qualify the article for retention under the "50-year standard" of criterion 2 of WP:SCHOOL. As there is no independent evidence of this fact at this point in the article or on the school's web site, and given the paucity of information, I must vote to delete. Any additional confirmatory information or evidence of notability will be added or the article or will be recreated. Alansohn 03:49, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• keep notable school!!! Audiobooks 21:12, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Do you have any substantial reason to back that up? Adding exclamation points doesn't make an argument by assertion any more valid. JoshuaZ 23:47, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I would suggest this person's vote not be counted at all; if you look at his history, he posted to each school's AfD only a minute or two apart from each other - meaning he never bothered to read the article, but only went to each article posting "notable school!!!" regardless of the information presented therein. Trusilver 22:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. If someone wants to merge they can, but there is not much there to be merged. Vegaswikian 01:14, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or at worst merge Albatross2147 22:31, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Conditional keep: if the article can be expanded. Right now, it's only a dictionary entry. 38.100.34.2 00:00, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No asserted notability, and age does not equal importance. This is just a directory entry. -- Kicking222 04:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Passes WP:SCHOOL using the ridiculous 50 year rule and fails WP:SCHOOLS3. I would be open to reversing my position if the article is expanded. Trusilver 22:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn school. Eusebeus 11:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no evidence of notability or any importance, as the nominator brought up. --Kuzaar^-T-C- 15:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.