The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was There is No Consensus to delete the article. -- GB fan 11:13, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lake Placid (film series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Placid (film series) Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is redundant, unnecessary, and messy, and contains no new and little contents which are merely copies of contents from another article. TurokSwe (talk) 17:50, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - There's a template directly below with the films in thus making this entire article redundant ?....., So I'm not really understanding why this "article" was ever created.... –Davey2010^Talk 00:42, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:59, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:59, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as creator. Clearly notable. I created this stub to provide an overview/umbrella of the series. It can always be improved on. The fact that there is a navbox is irrelevant, in actual fact there should be an article to justify the navbox. --Rob Sinden (talk) 08:49, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: If kept, this could merit a rename to Lake Placid franchise, as the series spans several films and some games as well. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:06, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NCF, the correct disambiguator would be "(franchise)", however, a couple of promotional tie in web games do not satisfy the definition of a franchise. There is already a move discussion in place. --Rob Sinden (talk) 08:02, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think the real issue here is that it doesn't please YOU. TurokSwe (talk) 09:16, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The real issue is that you don't understand what qualifies as a franchise by our definition, and you have no respect for our guidelines or MOS and you have made a rather WP:POINTY AFD. --Rob Sinden (talk) 10:52, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. What other article does this duplicate? Of course it will have some overlap with the component parts of the franchise, but deleting it on those grounds would be like deleting Car because we have articles on every individual part of the car. bd2412 T 14:53, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

• Delete - nothing notable about this series. Furthermore this article is somewhat pointless; for example, the table listing all the characters as they appear in the series reveals that only two appeared in more than one film (and those two only appeared in two). So basically each movie gets a whole new cast and there is no crossover. —Мандичка^YO 😜 01:43, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep No valid deletion arguement presented by the nominator. AfD is not for cleanup. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 08:31, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.