The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was 'Speedy delete' . Owen× ☎ 23:43, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hoax. Zero google hits. Perhaps this could be speedy as a patent nonsense? --202.156.6.54 02:46, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Google. CanadianCaesar 03:09, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete a very entertaining hoax.... wish we had a page to save the funny ones!
  • You mean like WP:BJAODN? User:Zoe|^(talk) 06:08, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete hoax. Not good enough for BJAODN, I don't think. NSLE _{(讨论+extra)} 08:23, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete. The only Google hit is the wiki page. HackJandy 06:50, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete, patent nonsense. Or delete original research, if you prefer. Stifle 23:37, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.