Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Clearly too soon as simply none of this establishes notability in policy.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adrian Donsome Hanson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 06:57, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Adrian Donsome Hanson. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 06:08, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Adrian Donsome Hanson. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 23:24, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at User Talk:SwisterTwister#VerifiableSources, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 23:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tvx1 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adrian Donsome Hanson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tvx1 23:32, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! The Serenader, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tvx1 23:32, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Adrian Donsome Hanson, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:48, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:The Serenader, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 🇵🇸🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 22:04, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedily deleted because (your reason here) --The Serenader (talk) 22:25, 27 March 2025 (UTC) Relevant articles are being added and the article is being rewritten.[reply]

Hello, I am Michael Bundi, and I want to disclose that I have a connection to the subject of this article. I have edited this article to improve accuracy, neutrality, and verifiability by adding reliable sources, including media features, interviews, and credible third-party articles. My intention is to align the content with Wikipedia's guidelines and avoid promotional tone.

If any editors have concerns or feedback, I’m happy to collaborate and discuss further improvements. Thank you. — Michael Bundi

This page should not be speedily deleted because (your reason here) --The Serenader (talk) 23:22, 27 March 2025 (UTC) Hello,[reply]

This page should not be speedily deleted because it meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. It includes significant coverage from multiple reliable sources, such as Nation Africa, Capital FM, People Daily, and Tuko, which provide in-depth details about Michael Bundi’s achievements as a prominent reggae artist and digital content creator.

The article highlights his cultural influence on platforms like TikTok and YouTube, his recognition by Etana’s Grammy-nominated album Pamoja, and his receiving of a YouTube Silver Play Button. These milestones demonstrate lasting significance in the music and digital content industries, making him a notable public figure.

I respectfully request that the speedy deletion tag be reconsidered and removed to allow for further improvements to the article.

Thank you. --The Serenader (talk) 23:22, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedily deleted because (your reason here) --The Serenader (talk) 23:29, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I request the removal of the speedy deletion tag on this page.

Please remove: `{{db|reason=Article does not meet notability standards}}`

Reason: The article meets notability standards based on the following: 1. The subject, Michael Bundi, has been covered by multiple reliable sources, including Nation, Tuko, and People Daily Digital, which provide significant coverage of his music career, achievements, and TikTok influence. 2. Bundi is notable for being part of Grammy-nominated reggae artist Etana’s Pamoja album (as confirmed by [Citizen TV Kenya](https://www.citizen.digital/entertainment/etanas-pamoja-album-featuring-kenyan-artists-nominated-for-2022-grammy-awards-n287711)). 3. His YouTube account earned a Silver Play Button, and he is frequently cited among top Kenyan creators, as seen on Mpasho and Capital FM.

The article provides well-sourced content that verifies the subject's notability according to Wikipedia guidelines.

--The Serenader (talk) 23:29, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@The Serenader: The two edit requests you placed here on your talk page are not the proper way of addressing the concerns with your draft, and I have removed them. I suggest you read the information left by user:Gheus at the bottom of this page and edit your draft accordingly, or follow the provided links for assistance. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 18:54, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to let you know, I've moved Michael Bundi to draftspace because I'm not quite sure about its notability. Thanks! ~ Rusty ^meow ~ 01:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gheus were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Bundi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gheus (talk) 11:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michael Bundi. Thanks! bonadea contributions talk 13:50, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sophisticatedevening was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Apple music, Youtube and Tiktok are not reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Bundi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 16:42, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Bundi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

NeoGaze (talk) 09:34, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]