Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Only a single peripheral source. No evidence of notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sophia Chang (Korean-American entrepreneur) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   09:49, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kimetit! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!  Velella  Velella Talk   09:49, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kimetit, welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you moved a couple of drafts into article space; two of them are anywhere near acceptable as an article so they have been moved back. Determining whether a draft could become an article is something that requires more experience than you have at the moment, so please allow drafts to be submitted for review. Thanks!

Incidentally, how did you find Draft:Derivan (now at Draft:Derivan (company))? What is your connection to the users Wentwasp (talk · contribs) and Sielegitt (talk · contribs)? --bonadea contributions talk 11:07, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kemetit, please answer @Bonadea's questions before you continue to edit. S0091 (talk) 13:55, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kimetit, communication is required. This now the third note requesting an explanation about your connection to other editors but you have continued to move drafts to mainspace created by others without responding, most recently StuDocu created by Ajargrey. @Drmies when you have minute can you take a look? S0091 (talk) 19:36, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]