United Airlines was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result October 16, 2006 Good article nominee Not listed January 26, 2013 Good article nominee Not listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Illinois High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Aviation: Airlines This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation This article is supported by the airline project. Chicago High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Companies High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Add ITA Airways under alliances and codeshare agreements ^[1] 202.86.32.122 (talk) 01:52, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. I’ve added them in the list. (Please review to check if I’ve done what you meant). By the way, the source used in that table already mentions ITA. (The live version, not the archived one. I don’t know if I should change the archived one to a more recent one, because that might not be accurate for some of the other partners.)

Thanks for your request. Slomo666 (talk) 17:17, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The destination of Douglas-Charles Airport in Dominica from Newark Airport is missing. Casimir28 (talk) 04:28, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. The source you provided doesn't list that as an available route. Nubzor [T][C] 13:07, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I added the "quotation needed" template to the founder because William E. Boeing seems to suggest the founding company was United Aircraft and Transport Corporation, which bought a bunch of small airlines and THEN put them under United Air Lines. Our article is also unclear if Boeing had a controlling interest or really was the sole controller and thus founder of UAL. A quote from the source could clear this up easily, so I've requested one. EducatedRedneck (talk) 02:04, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen a little back-and-forth around what to call the airport located in Newark. I suggest we do away with the piping altogether per MOS:EGG and just have it be Newark Airport. I'll see if I can go through and similarly de-pipe some of the others. I suggest this for 3 reasons:

1. MOS:PLACE #1 says that when there is a commonly used name, we should use it. It appears that calling it simply "Newark Airport" is more than twice as common as any construction containing "Newark Liberty". Therefore, we use the common name.
2. There is no confusion over what "Newark Airport" is. This means that, even if there's a name change, "Newark Airport" will still be clear.
3. For the same reason, depiping means if there is any change in the future, we won't have to worry about redlinks or otherwise go through every instance of "Newark Liberty International Airport" and change it to the new name. By using the redirect instead of piping, all we have to do is let someone change the "Newark Airport" piping to the correct name.

Precedent already exists for things such as the North Korea, which uses the common name rather than the mouthful of DPRK. EducatedRedneck (talk) 00:41, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Also, note in our list it's San Jose International Airport, note Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport. EducatedRedneck (talk) 00:54, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah Newark is the sole major airport in Newark, so it doesn't need Liberty for disambiguation (unlike say, Houston-Intercontinental to distinguish from Houston Hobby, or Chicago-O'Hare to distinguish from Chicago-Midway). 4300streetcar (talk) 02:47, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This. There’s no need for the disambiguation. At this point using “Newark” alone to represent the airport is long-standing precedent across dozens if not hundreds of pages. RickyCourtney (talk) 03:34, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]