Talk:John J. Beckley/GA1

GA review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 23:18, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Jon698 (talk · contribs) 17:05, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    I have gone through the entire article and made some minor copyedits. I see nothing wrong with the writing, layout, or lead.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
    There are twelve sources within the Works Cited section. I have conducted a spot check of the following sources to check for accuracy: Pasley 1996 and Berkeley & Berkeley 1975. Sources [2] and [3] accurately cover his early life in the United Kingdom. Sources [9] and [10] cover his career in the early 1770s. [22] covers his career as mayor and his inability to rise in Virginia's social ranks. [18], [24], and [25] cover Madison and Randolph's views on Beckley's attempt to become secretary of the Constitutional Convention and the quote is correctly copied and attributed. [26] covers his attempt to become clerk of the U.S. House so that he could continue sending money to his parents. [30] covers his new found social advancement in New York and his relations with Jefferson and Madison. [33] covers his attempt to have George Clinton replace John Adams as vice president. [34] and [35] cover Beckley's views on the Jay Treaty and accusations of Wolcott overpaying Washington.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    The article covers his entire life, involvement in politics at the local, state, and federal levels, and his numerous clerical appointments.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    I see no neutrality problems.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    No edits war on the page or significant changes.
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    There are seven images in the article and all are public domain. I added an image of Alexander Hamilton due to his large role in the "Career under the Federalists" section.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    @Generalissima: I see nothing preventing this from becoming a good article. Jon698 (talk) 05:45, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]