This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Pakistan: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Villages (defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Villages, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.VillagesWikipedia:WikiProject VillagesTemplate:WikiProject VillagesVillages Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

Hi, Shouldn't the article name be Hund (village) instead of this confusing title? Thanks... SharabSalam (talk) 02:01, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@SharabSalam noted... 69shehryar (talk) 06:41, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi -- I added the AI generated tag here; the edits by 69shehryar and Shehrology display a large amount of indicators of LLM use. Note that the latter editor's userpage also appears AI generated. The whole thing needs thorough review for factual accuracy and tone. Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:35, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for raising this concern.

I am the contributor who wrote much of the material in question and who uploaded the images on Wikimedia Commons. I did not use an LLM to generate the content. The text was written after months of local research and is based on the following published sources and local knowledge:

1 Fidaullah Sehrai, Hund: The Forgotten City of Gandhara (1979).

2 Abdur Rehman, The Last Two Dynasties of the Shahis (thesis, 1976).

I welcome a thorough review for factual accuracy and tone. To help this review I will:

1 Post full citations and specific page numbers for each claimed fact.

2 Provide links to the relevant revision diffs (so editors can see exactly which passages are questioned).

3 Provide evidence of authorship for the images (Commons upload history, original filenames and, where allowed, source notes).

4 Reword any passages that appear non-neutral or problematic, in consultation with editors.

Could you please point to the specific revision(s) or line(s) that display indicators of LLM use (a diff link or revision ID would be most helpful)? Once I have that, I will supply the cited sources and, if needed, a revised wording for those sections.

If community consensus finds portions unacceptable after review, I will correct or remove them. If we cannot reach agreement here, I am prepared to request an independent review (in accordance with Wikipedia processes).

Thank you for taking the time to review this. I want the article to be accurate and useful for readers. Shehrology (talk) 13:11, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia editors,

I am a local resident of Hund village and a regular contributor to the Hund, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa article. Over the past months I personally uploaded more than 60 original images to Wikimedia Commons and spent several months researching and writing the article text using reliable references.

Recently I discovered that much of the content I had added has been removed. I would be grateful if an editor could explain the specific reasons for those removals (for example: which sections, which edit diffs, or which policy concerns). My intention has always been to help readers with accurate, well-referenced information about my village.

I also received the following message regarding my contributions (verbatim):

I added the AI generated tag here; the edits by display a large amount of indicators of LLM use. Note that the latter editor's userpage also appears AI generated. The whole thing needs thorough review for factual accuracy and tone.

If the removals are due to concerns about automated or AI-generated content, I would like to clarify the following and offer to cooperate fully:

• The images I uploaded are my own photographs and are available on Wikimedia Commons (I can provide upload timestamps or file IDs on request).
• The article text was written by me after research; where possible I added citations. I can supply the full set of references and page numbers used, and I am willing to reformat or reword any sections that editors find problematic.
• If there are particular passages that appear AI-generated or otherwise questionable, please point me to the exact diffs so I may correct them or provide source evidence.

I respectfully request one of the following actions from the reviewing editors:

1. Restore those well-sourced parts if their removal was accidental or if policy concerns can be resolved by providing citations.
2. If removal is appropriate, please indicate which parts and why so I can revise them to meet Wikipedia standards.
3. If further review is needed, I invite editors to discuss specific issues on this Talk page so we can reach an acceptable, transparent outcome.

Thank you for your time and for maintaining Wikipedia’s standards. I appreciate any guidance and I am ready to respond quickly with supporting documentation.

Sincerely,

Shehryar Khan

(Local resident and contributor, Hund, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa) Shehrology (talk) 13:21, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]