Talk:Every Night (Hannah Diamond song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Skyshifter (talk · contribs) 13:02, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 03:35, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Lead

Add how it was diamonds first billboard chart entry.
Done

Background

Nothing but the last line in the section seems relevent.
"It was written by A. G. Cook and Hannah Diamond, with Cook producing it" -> "It was written by A. G. Cook and Diamond. Cook additionally served as producer.
Added something similar

Composition

Alot of quotes, anyway to reduce this?

Reduced a bit, though I'm afraid of losing too much of the quotes' original meanings if I paraphrase too much. I believe the current number of quotes is acceptable.

Release and reception

Why is "The Forty-Five" reliable?
It was listed as reliable on WP:A/S following this discussion.

Misc

Infobox image has proper rational and infobox.
No talk page messages since a passed DYK two months ago.
Earwig detects around 12% similarty.
Archive all sources probably just use IA bot
IABot request sent, though it appears that it is down right now.
Dates are inconsistently formatted
I don't know if this was pointed as a problem, though it should be fine with the {{Use dmy dates}} at the top.
Spot checked 8 refs and everything lined up

@OlifanofmrTennant: done! Skyshiftertalk 11:05, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]