Hi, thank you for reading my page for Daisy L. Hung. I noticed that you tagged an external links issue. I have 4 external links to the organizations hosting Hung's talks and lectures. Each talk/lecture has also been properly cited by secondary sources. I was wondering what specific issue I could work on to better improve the page? Pjtian (talk) 23:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pjtian, I'd recommend removing all the external links to the organisations, as there is no need for them, especially not in the main text. The subsequent cites are sufficient. -Kj cheetham (talk) 14:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. To clarify, links to organisations are number 19 on WP:LINKSTOAVOID. -Kj cheetham (talk) 14:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see, thank you for letting me know and for linking the wikipedia page addressing this. I have removed all external links. Could you please remove the external links tag? If not, could you please let me know what other issues regarding the links I should be aware of? Thank you!Pjtian (talk) 19:01, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to help. And done! -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:40, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned on the talk page of ISHPSSB, I've added all the secondary and tertiary sources I could find about the society. This includes two to three obituaries, two research studies on the society, a Brazilian press release about the conference in 2017, a book that recounted the seminal meeting, blog articles on individuals I cited in the history section, etc. This is probably the best we can do for an academic society and more than most have done. Please let me know whether this is sufficient for the primary source tag to be removed. FlybellFly (talk) 23:27, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FlybellFly. My original concern was too many of the references were to ISHPSSB's own website. The article is in a better condition now though, so I've removed the tag. I'd argue that if other societies don't have sufficient independant significant coverage perhaps they should be considered for deletion as may not be notable if none are found. Sometimes WP:OTHER is relevant. -Kj cheetham (talk) 14:30, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kj cheetham,

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	DannyS712 bot III (talk)	67,552	Patrol Page Curation
2	Rosguill (talk)	63,821	Patrol Page Curation
3	John B123 (talk)	21,697	Patrol Page Curation
4	Onel5969 (talk)	19,879	Patrol Page Curation
5	JTtheOG (talk)	12,901	Patrol Page Curation
6	Mcampany (talk)	9,103	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	6,401	Patrol Page Curation
8	Mccapra (talk)	4,918	Patrol Page Curation
9	Hughesdarren (talk)	4,520	Patrol Page Curation
10	Utopes (talk)	3,958	Patrol Page Curation

Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello Kj Cheetham, I noticed that you have been looking at my draft article for Una McCann and you have made some helpful edits, which I appreciate. As you could probably tell, I am new to Wikipedia. I am not sure if this is the appropriate area to ask you about this but what would I have to do with the blue links that have disambiguation next to them, is too vague and how can I talk to others who edit the page? I would appreciate any response or help, thank you. BiologyATP10 (talk) 23:53, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BiologyATP10. Welcome to Wikipedia! And thank you for your message. Looks like you've managed to work out how to solve the disambiguation issues already - it was a case of for example depression points to a disambiguation page, which is discouraged to link directly too, and Depression (mood) is more appropriate. I should add that in your infobox American, BS and MD should also be disambiguated. For finding others who edit the page, the best place is to view at the history page, which I assume is how you found me. Happy to answer any further questions you may have though! -Kj cheetham (talk) 12:32, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm TheAafi. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Afiya Zia, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

─ The Aafī ^(talk) 14:14, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the intrusion, but I seem to recall you are a page mover? If so, could you help me figure out how to do a somewhat confusing move I was hoping to carry out (and which I don't have the rights to do)? Basically, I want to move Miss Honey Dijon to Honey Dijon per WP:COMMONNAME (she's not known by "Miss" anymore). But Honey Dijon is already a dab page and so I can't overwrite it. Should I just move Miss Honey Dijon to Honey Dijon (musician)? Or should I request a move at Wikipedia:Requested moves? Thanks for any help you can provide, and sorry to ask such a nitpicky question. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 02:34, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AleatoryPonderings, thank you for your message. No intrusion at all. :) I am indeed a page mover. Normally if there was no primary topic, Honey Dijon would be the DAB page, and would use (musician) for the person's article. However I felt that the person was the primary topic in this case. So I've taken the liberty of doing the required moves. I also fixed the redirect at Honey dijon (disambiguation) which was using a lowercase "d". The issue was that you would have needed to surpress the automatically redirect to do what you originally tried to do I think. I hope this is okay! -Kj cheetham (talk) 08:49, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much! I appreciate it :) Hope you're doing well. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 14:04, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Kj cheetham, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Happy editing, Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:59, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Fylindfotberserk Thank you! :-D -Kj cheetham (talk) 15:14, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kj cheetham. I added citations to Klein's page to verify her education and teaching credentials and experience. Her publications and honors appear under three different versions of her name: Debra L., Debra, and Debbie. Perhaps that is part of the verification problem. Thank you. Lolade1998 (talk) 17:33, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lolade1998, thanks for making the changes. I've removed the tags. The issue was more a case of those sections not having any refs at all to easily verify the facts of a living person, rather than any issue with multiple variations of the name. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:34, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Lolade1998, You might also want to look at rewording the section on 'A Political Economy of Lifestyle and Aesthetics', as it's a bit too close to one of the sources when looking at Earwig's Copyvio Detector. -Kj cheetham (talk) 12:08, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kj cheetham. Thank you for the suggestion. I have made the changes you suggested. Lolade1998 (talk) 17:01, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.