User talk:Jayzlimno: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Bkissin (talk | contribs)
Notification: Your Articles for creation submission has been accepted (AFCH 0.9.1)
JarrahTree (talk | contribs)
project scopes discussion
Line 92: Line 92:
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
[[User:Bkissin|Bkissin]] ([[User talk:Bkissin|talk]]) 18:43, 14 February 2019 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc talk-->
[[User:Bkissin|Bkissin]] ([[User talk:Bkissin|talk]]) 18:43, 14 February 2019 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc talk-->

== trying to see how the scope of wikiproject oceans can be re-written ==
I recently re-activated wikiproject oceans - and think, just think, I can see how the two projects - oceans and limnology and oceanography can co-exist very well - but I need at least one editor involved in the setup of the newer and much smaller by edit project - to see if there can be some ground for a good positive discussion about the scopes. I would really appreciate if I could have the discussion with you - but if there is a problem with that - someone on the newer project you might recommend... The issues are simply working out where one starts and the other ends in the scope and category tree - I think it can be done, just hope I find some opportunity to work it out with someone ! cheers [[User:JarrahTree|JarrahTree]] 00:52, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:52, 18 February 2019

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Jayzlimno. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Nick Moyes (talk) 20:38, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Jayzlimno! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:28, Tuesday, January 10, 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Jayzlimno! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:45, Tuesday, January 10, 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Jayzlimno. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Wikipedia:WikiProject Limnology".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 22:28, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Limnology and Oceanography, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Project-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

  • If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the .
  • If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 16:21, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Jayzlimno. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2–3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 22:49, 29 October 2018 (UTC). (You can at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Jayzlimno! You created a thread called Automated WikiProject tagging at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please .

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Limnology and Oceanography articles categories

Hello, Jayzlimno,

I noticed that you recreated these categories even though they are not being used. Could you please assign parent categories to them so they are not isolated? That would tie them into a WikiProject or wherever else they might be used, they'd be part of Wikipedia categorization organization. Doing that would help avoid deletion but they should really be used with articles assigned to these categories or they are likely to be deleted in the future. Empty categories that are not being used are regularly deleted on Wikipedia. Liz Read! Talk! 02:03, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry about that. I will assign parent categories and articles to the L&O article category. Thanks, Liz! Jayzlimno (talk) 14:41, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are among the few

Watch here to see how few people have figured out the globe like you did. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:13, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cool I'll check it out. Thanks Anna Frodesiak. Jayzlimno (talk) 13:09, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emily Bernhardt has been accepted

Emily Bernhardt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

  • If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the .
  • If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 18:43, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

trying to see how the scope of wikiproject oceans can be re-written

I recently re-activated wikiproject oceans - and think, just think, I can see how the two projects - oceans and limnology and oceanography can co-exist very well - but I need at least one editor involved in the setup of the newer and much smaller by edit project - to see if there can be some ground for a good positive discussion about the scopes. I would really appreciate if I could have the discussion with you - but if there is a problem with that - someone on the newer project you might recommend... The issues are simply working out where one starts and the other ends in the scope and category tree - I think it can be done, just hope I find some opportunity to work it out with someone ! cheers JarrahTree 00:52, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]