Welcome!

Hello, Alexis Jazz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 18:33, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We don't give spoiler warnings. See Wikipedia:Spoiler. Fences&Windows 19:57, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've read it. Still, I think another rule should also be added in that case. That whenever there is a plot description, it should be complete. Now stories sometimes only have a plot introduction and sometimes a complete plot description. Before you read it, you never know what it is, so you never know if it is safe to read before watching/reading the work. From an encyclopedic point of view, I believe the plot description should be complete and not just an introduction (Wikipedia is not a review magazine or advertising means). This way it would also be more clear that you should *never* read the plot section and warnings are not needed anymore. W3ird N3rd (talk) 20:29, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think Wikipedia:How to write a plot summary covers a lot of this ground. Fences&Windows 01:38, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, W3ird N3rd. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, W3ird N3rd. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The Technical Barnstar
	You are a magician. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:29, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Beyond the pictures on Commons, I am also looking for a picture of Mark R. Cockrill and his relatives...Zigzig20s (talk) 00:15, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Zigzig20s: Your request may be better suited (and get more response) at c:Commons:Picture requests. Alexis Jazz (talk) 19:28, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, there is this user who is a lying troll that uses Portuguese written sources in English Wikipedia. In the battle of Barawa, the Portuguese failed in capturing that city during the Battle of Barawa but this user is removing all of the authentic English sources that clearly states Ajuran won but he uses Portuguese when we don't know what it says. So could you please keep on eye on Battle of Barawa just like you keep an eye of Barawa? I need your help to stop this vandalizing user, I will much appreciate it sir! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Logoat (talk • contribs) 25 April 2018 (UTC)

CERTAINLY MY FRIEND I CAN HELP YOU! Alexis Jazz (talk) 15:26, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You so much sir! Really appreciated your work to try to talk to him and I was patient with him and tried to communicate but all he does is revert my English authentic sources and says "stop changing or I'll report you" so could you please report him and tell him to dialogue? Also, please revert to my post and tell him to go on talk page and report him because that is what I have done.

Also, if you have any future dispute, call me and I'll support you at any time.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Logoat (talk • contribs) 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello, sorry you were sucked into this issue, but things should be settled now. The user Logoat doesn't even read his own sources, as you can see at the article talk page. Best regards, Crenelator (talk) 22:05, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I do have access to Newspapers.com, but I have zero understanding of your context. Can you please ask everyone (with more context) at WP:Resource requests? Thanks!Zigzig20s (talk) 03:02, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Zigzig20s: I just need the quotes as proof that the phrase exists: Wiktionary:Criteria for inclusion#Attestation. Also to show in what way the phrase gets used. The quotes will be similar to those already on wikt:Citations:wake up and smell the ashes, but Wiktionary requires 3 quotes in print media and there are only 2 now. One good quote would actually be enough, I asked for two or three because requirements for quotes are a bit complicated and I wanted to be safe. Alexis Jazz (talk) 03:07, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I asked at WP:Resource requests. Alexis Jazz (talk) 03:18, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mark R. Isfeld Senior Secondary School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spirit bear (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you bot, but that's exactly what I wanted to do. Alexis Jazz (talk) 09:41, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to actually look at the sources you are adding. Your claim that the logo is a polar bear designed by a particular person was sourced to an empty archived copy of a person page. Meters (talk) 17:40, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]