Template talk:Economic systems sidebar: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Nema Fakei (talk | contribs)
Regarding 'Actual' Economies
 
WAS 4.250 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Theory vs History ==
== Theory vs History ==
If you're going to be picky, it's NPOV to suggest that Capitalist, Open, and Socialist economies have ever been realised, so I don't see that making this a template for 'actual' economies is particularly useful. We do have many other articles on 'actual economies', and they are of the form [[Economy of Somewhere]]. --[[User:Nema Fakei|Nema Fakei]] 00:46, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
If you're going to be picky, it's NPOV to suggest that Capitalist, Open, and Socialist economies have ever been realised, so I don't see that making this a template for 'actual' economies is particularly useful. We do have many other articles on 'actual economies', and they are of the form [[Economy of Somewhere]]. --[[User:Nema Fakei|Nema Fakei]] 00:46, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

This template is for actual TYPES of historical economies of actual places people and segments of society. Theoretical and future and science-fiction and ideological economies do not belong. Political and governmental philosophies especially do not belong. Sub-economies do belong. Philosophies do not belong. Specific examples such as [[American System (economics)]] or [[Socialism with Chinese characteristics]] do not belong. [[User:WAS 4.250|WAS 4.250]] 03:10, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:10, 20 May 2006

Theory vs History

If you're going to be picky, it's NPOV to suggest that Capitalist, Open, and Socialist economies have ever been realised, so I don't see that making this a template for 'actual' economies is particularly useful. We do have many other articles on 'actual economies', and they are of the form Economy of Somewhere. --Nema Fakei 00:46, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This template is for actual TYPES of historical economies of actual places people and segments of society. Theoretical and future and science-fiction and ideological economies do not belong. Political and governmental philosophies especially do not belong. Sub-economies do belong. Philosophies do not belong. Specific examples such as American System (economics) or Socialism with Chinese characteristics do not belong. WAS 4.250 03:10, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]