Category talk:Freemasons: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Good Olfactory (talk | contribs)
indent
Line 11: Line 11:
I think this needs to be examined again. [[User:Blueboar|Blueboar]] ([[User talk:Blueboar|talk]]) 15:08, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
I think this needs to be examined again. [[User:Blueboar|Blueboar]] ([[User talk:Blueboar|talk]]) 15:08, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
:It needs to be repopulated again, if anything. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk to me</font>]]</sub> 04:08, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
:It needs to be repopulated again, if anything. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk to me</font>]]</sub> 04:08, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
::Absolutely agree. The discussion (referenced above) shows an overwhelming consensus to keep this category, and also demonstrates that the 2007 decision to delete the category was fundamentally flawed. We need to repopulate the list. If there are issues that people feel make the category "problematic" then they should be discussed here, and resolved. '''<font color="green">[[User:Timothy Titus|Timothy Titus]]</font> ''<sup><font color="orange">[[User talk:Timothy Titus|Talk To TT]]</font>''</sup>''' 04:08, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:08, 16 April 2012

WikiProject iconReligion
WikiProject iconThis category is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.

BLP note

Problematic category

How did this get recreated... it was deleted and salted (see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 November 10#Category:Freemasons)?

Ah, found the discussion where it was recreated... see: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 January 3#2007 November 10...

I think this needs to be examined again. Blueboar (talk) 15:08, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It needs to be repopulated again, if anything. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 04:08, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely agree. The discussion (referenced above) shows an overwhelming consensus to keep this category, and also demonstrates that the 2007 decision to delete the category was fundamentally flawed. We need to repopulate the list. If there are issues that people feel make the category "problematic" then they should be discussed here, and resolved. Timothy Titus Talk To TT 04:08, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]