Template talk:Repeated IP abuse: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
BenAveling (talk | contribs) →Changes: use only short blocks to limit collateral damage |
Bill Thayer (talk | contribs) m →Changes |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:::*<nowiki>Note: This a shared IP Address. <strong>Please use only short blocks</strong> to limit collateral damage.<br></nowiki> |
:::*<nowiki>Note: This a shared IP Address. <strong>Please use only short blocks</strong> to limit collateral damage.<br></nowiki> |
||
:::An example may be seen at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:202.6.138.33&oldid=42039428]. Regards, [[User talk:BenAveling|Ben Aveling]] 11:17, 3 March 2006 (UTC) |
:::An example may be seen at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:202.6.138.33&oldid=42039428]. Regards, [[User talk:BenAveling|Ben Aveling]] 11:17, 3 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
::::Not all repeat vandals are shared-IP's, by any means. And of those that are, not infrequently the entire list of "contributions" is vandalism, whether it's just a single user at that shared address (the others not caring to do Wikipedia, or whether, as in the case of a number of schools, it's all a pile of young children each doing their own vandalism. [[User:Bill Thayer|Bill]] 13:32, 3 March 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 13:32, 3 March 2006
Purpose
Used to mark pages of anonymous editors who have been repeatedly blocked for vandalism.
Changes
Personally, I preferred the yellow, stood out more. My eyes are in their mid-30's and didn't mind. I dont' really care about the vandal's eyes. :) Wikibofh(talk) 17:22, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah, me too -- and my eyes are in their 50s. It's supposed to be uggily. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 22:49, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- No, it's not supposed to be obnoxious. We got some template guidelines for talkpages which we should stick to.
SoothingR 23:32, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
- No, it's not supposed to be obnoxious. We got some template guidelines for talkpages which we should stick to.
- I prefer the the yellow - it carries more content, shall we say. But what I came here for was to suggest adding something the following
- Note: This a shared IP Address. <strong>Please use only short blocks</strong> to limit collateral damage.<br>
- An example may be seen at [1]. Regards, Ben Aveling 11:17, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- I prefer the the yellow - it carries more content, shall we say. But what I came here for was to suggest adding something the following
- Not all repeat vandals are shared-IP's, by any means. And of those that are, not infrequently the entire list of "contributions" is vandalism, whether it's just a single user at that shared address (the others not caring to do Wikipedia, or whether, as in the case of a number of schools, it's all a pile of young children each doing their own vandalism. Bill 13:32, 3 March 2006 (UTC)