Talk:Robin Miller (nurse): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
comment
Line 13: Line 13:
::::I'll leave a note on the talk page of [[User:SYSS Mouse]], the user who performed the original move, just so he/she has a chance to provide some input. —[[User:Cleared as filed|Cleared as filed.]] 14:49, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
::::I'll leave a note on the talk page of [[User:SYSS Mouse]], the user who performed the original move, just so he/she has a chance to provide some input. —[[User:Cleared as filed|Cleared as filed.]] 14:49, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
:::::Thats fair. [[User:SeanMack|SeanMack]] 14:52, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
:::::Thats fair. [[User:SeanMack|SeanMack]] 14:52, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
::::::I am not against it. But it is improper to use '''Sir Robin Miller''' as article title. (This violates manual of style. See [[Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(names_and_titles)#Other non-royal names]]).[[User:SYSS Mouse|SYSS Mouse]] 20:55, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:55, 4 February 2006

Did You Know An entry from Robin Miller (nurse) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 1 February, 2006.
Wikipedia
Wikipedia

Article title

Shouldn't this article be moved to Robin Miller (aviator) instead? It seems that it was her aviation history that makes her notable, not her being a nurse. —Cleared as filed. 12:54, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's a difficult one, since it's the interaction between being a nurse and an aviator that made her notable. I must say I was a bit miffed that the move was made when there are no other Robin Miller entries already in wikipedia - the other possible Robin Miller (HMV) could be easily distinguished by the Sir. So I originally thought that the move was a bit too quick off the mark. However, when I thought about it, generally in wiki, people of the same name are distinguished by their occupation, Since she was first and foremost a nurse I guess it is reasonable that the article stands as is. That said I am open to other solutions.... SeanMack 14:09, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
After re-reading the article, I agree that it's a bit more ambiguous than I first thought. I'd be all for moving this back to Robin Miller, and moving the disambiguation page to Robin Miller (disambiguation). —Cleared as filed. 14:24, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Makes sense to me - you want to do it or shall I? Or do we need others to concur? SeanMack 14:38, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'll leave a note on the talk page of User:SYSS Mouse, the user who performed the original move, just so he/she has a chance to provide some input. —Cleared as filed. 14:49, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thats fair. SeanMack 14:52, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am not against it. But it is improper to use Sir Robin Miller as article title. (This violates manual of style. See Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(names_and_titles)#Other non-royal names).SYSS Mouse 20:55, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]