This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Musicians This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Mid-importance). Rock music Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 5.

This entire section is in violation of the WP:TRIV guidelines for lists of trivia. Most of the section is unsourced and full of non-notable information, and therefore faces mass deletion unless rewritten to comply with wikipedia policy. magnius (talk) 14:37, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the information should be sourced, but not that it is non-notable. The general consensus among most editors of this page is that these references in popular culture make a statement about how Journey is more than just a rock band but has become a "concept." A bit over a year ago I moved the basis for this section over from a dedicated page.

Let's encourage that it be sourced as much as possible, and perhaps the top of the section should explain what I just said.

Dave Golland (talk) 12:06, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Evenn with sources, it is still an indiscriminate list of non-notable trivia that violates WP:TRIV. We really don't need a list of films and TV episodes that Journey songs have appeared in, so that will be the first casualty of a cull. It is enough to say that their songs have featured in many films and television shows, and offer a few of the more notable examples...but "Wheel in the Sky" was played on a recap segment of the sci-fi show Supernatural." is a completly unnecessary piece of filler that adds nothing but useless bulk to the article. We also don't need pointless information about the bands posters being seen in the background in films, or the fact that a snippet of a song can be heard on a car radio in an episode/film. The gameshows section is being culled right now, it's ridiculously unencyclopedic and non-notable. magnius (talk) 12:27, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Dave Golland (talk) 16:16, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, as well. Why is it that almost every wikipedia page on rock bands is littered with references to 'The Simpsons' and 'Family Guy'? Is there someone out there who feels it is their duty to list every time a musician gets mentioned on the 'The Simpsons'? I find it odd that under the listing 'Television' there is no mention of Journey's 1979 performance on the television show 'The Midnight Special', yet here we have both 'The Simpsons' and 'Family Guy' references. This is useless and uninformative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bty86 (talk • contribs) 06:03, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After a year, it seems clear to me that drastic action is needed. When I first put it in, I thought the section was useful. Now I think it adds too much work to those of us who are serious about the page. We are constantly revising additional mentions of Journey in current TV shows. A brief paragraph at the end of the history stating that the music of Journey has been heard in countless television shows and movies and been the these song for sports teams (etc.) should suffice. Objections? Dave Golland (talk) 16:33, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that the German Music Charts are not represented in the studio albums discography portion and I havent been able to figure out how to add a section for "German Music Charts" but if someone knows how to do that they can add that the album Revelation debuted in Germany at #35 in the studio albums section.

Thanks,

Journey84 (talk) 21:03, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly were the "undercurrents of racism" that resulted in a supposed handful of Journey fans rejecting Pineda as a lead singer? This article doesn't say, and the cited source kind of handwaves over it as well, implying that there were a few offensive posts on random message boards. This mini-paragraph needs to be removed, improved, or at least given a "weasel words" tag, which I think I'll do. Thunderbunny (talk) 06:14, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For the "undercurrents", do a search on YouTube for any of the current Journey's videos featuring Arnel Pineda, and you'll see a handful of posters making racist comments about Pineda. It happens too consistently to be random -- there's a couple known YouTube accounts (NoSteveNoJourney is the most notorious) that appear making the same comments on almost all of Pineda's vids. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.118.3.225 (talk) 04:39, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

...so some random guy, that could be a Journey fan or some bored teenager, signed up for a YouTube account under the name NoSteveNoJourney and obsessively posted the same or similar comments on a bunch of YouTube videos. Gee, that's so interesting. Seriously, you just basically rephrased what I said above, that the "racist" response to Pineda appears to be limited to a handful of anonymous Internetters that could be enumerated with two hands. That's one variation of Wikipedia's working definition of weasel words...turning "this one guy on this message board" into a phenomenon of encyclopedic significance. Thunderbunny (talk) 07:24, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the information on Steve Perry's debut is incorrect. I was at an outdoor concert in August of 1977 (Super Bowl of Rock Series - Soldier's Field) and Steve Perry was introduced as the new lead singer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.59.102.18 (talk) 15:05, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Several band members have said that Perry was "tried out" during the Fleischman tour. Dave Golland (talk) 04:12, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe these edits are in good faith, but there are some problems and so they must be discussed here.

1. Dunbar's firing: According to the Flans book, Dunbar was fired because of musical differences with Perry. If there is other information which would result in a change in the way the firing is described on the page, user must provide a reference; one cannot simply remove the Flans reference.

2. Removal of other references (discography, etc). Users should not remove any references unless they can provide a replacement. If the reference link is no longer valid, users should say so in the edit summary and the ref should be replaced with "ref needed."

3. Soto's firing: to say that it happened because the band was looking to return to the Perry-style sound may be true but without a reference is POV. Better to say that Pineda is closer to the Perry sound than Soto--but even that would require a reference.

That said, it's always great to have another committed contributor!

Dave Golland (talk) 13:36, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]