Palestine Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

• Deleted a line stating the movement is a recognised terrorist organisation linked to Al-Qaeda. I suspect it was added by vandal. Logically, a movement recognised by the International Red Cross couldn't be also a recognised terrorist organisation.

Are you on crack?--71.246.30.208 (talk) 10:30, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the Red Crescent Society has been known to use "medical" immunity to transport terrorists and weapons, and has lied about events in order to slander Israel.

MSTCrow 02:30, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You think ??? Good for you, but do you have any reliable non-propagandist sources to confirm this slander against the Palestine Red Crescent Society ? --Moumine70 (talk) 15:14, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moumine70 and MSTCrow, How about here [1] and here [2] ? Try googling that as there are many...many... many more. Even have videos.--Degen Earthfast (talk) 16:51, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plus

Here [3]

here [4] A WHO document especially

" WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION FIFTY-SIXTH WORLD HEALTH ASSEMBLY A56/INF.DOC./6 Provisional agenda item 19 16 May 2003

14. There have been several proven cases of misuse of Palestinian ambulances to transport ammunition or explosive belts or to transfer terrorists."

here [5] --Degen Earthfast (talk) 17:02, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]

AND, what are "reliable non-propagandist sources" to you? WHo would be acceptable to you?--Degen Earthfast (talk) 17:16, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WHO would definitely be acceptable. BUT all Palestinian ambulances do not belong to PRCS. There are private ambulances as well, or ambulances belonging to the Ministry of Health or to hospitals. So we must just be careful not to mix up everything. §35 p. 8-9 in WHO Report is ok. --Moumine70 (talk) 14:11, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]