Template talk:Martial arts: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Kostan1 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kostan1 (talk | contribs)
Line 22: Line 22:


It's not a FA, not a GA, and not an A. But it's for shure a C. [[User:Kostan1|Kostan1]] ([[User talk:Kostan1|talk]]) 13:05, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
It's not a FA, not a GA, and not an A. But it's for shure a C. [[User:Kostan1|Kostan1]] ([[User talk:Kostan1|talk]]) 13:05, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
:Assessment is not the about length of the article but about it's quality, and currently there is not a single source accessible to the majority of readers of editors on the English wikipedia. I there fore agree with Bradford that it is not yet a [[c-class article]]. Please look at the definition of the different classes and examples [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Martial arts/Assessment|here]] --[[User:Nate1481|Nate1481]](<sup>[[User talk:Nate1481|t]]</sup>''/''<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Nate1481|c]]</sub>) 13:14, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
::But that means that even theoreticaly that article cant turn into a C-class. Not only that, when Bradford reverted me the article was realy weak. But now all the quotes were brought and translated. Now the claim that the general Englsih speaker cant't check it is not true, for who I translated all for few hours? It's all in English now. Lets hear more voices. If people oposse now, I revert myself. [[User:Kostan1|Kostan1]] ([[User talk:Kostan1|talk]]) 13:20, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:20, 18 August 2008

WikiProject iconMartial arts
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Martial arts. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article. If you think something is missing, please help us improve them!

What should be included?

Currently the template included every thing from 'start' class up, is this sensible of should we restrict it to 'b' class and up, as it is getting very full. --Nate1481( t/c) 17:16, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By my count there are currently 83 articles in the template, how many would be removed and how many would remain if we changed to a "B-class or better" standard? Bradford44 (talk) 17:40, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please see:Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Martial_arts#MA_nav_boxes --Nate1481(t/c) 08:05, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't Sambo MMA?

Sambo is listed as grappling in the box, but it includes punching and kicking, so I think it should be listed as a mixed art instead of grappling arts. --RisingSunWiki 23:05, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but the article is big enough, it's not a start anymore.

Yes it has no English references but: 1. It all was referenced and translated. I sat the whole day and made shure every claim has a source, I brought the quote, and translated the quote. 2. The article is to big to be a start.

It's not a FA, not a GA, and not an A. But it's for shure a C. Kostan1 (talk) 13:05, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment is not the about length of the article but about it's quality, and currently there is not a single source accessible to the majority of readers of editors on the English wikipedia. I there fore agree with Bradford that it is not yet a c-class article. Please look at the definition of the different classes and examples here --Nate1481(t/c) 13:14, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
But that means that even theoreticaly that article cant turn into a C-class. Not only that, when Bradford reverted me the article was realy weak. But now all the quotes were brought and translated. Now the claim that the general Englsih speaker cant't check it is not true, for who I translated all for few hours? It's all in English now. Lets hear more voices. If people oposse now, I revert myself. Kostan1 (talk) 13:20, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]