Talk:List of Masonic Grand Lodges: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Some small loonies added: new section |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Since this list indicates that it includes any Tom, Dick and Harry who forms a Grand Lodge... I have added a few fringe groups that claim to be Masons. More to come, unless the article is either deleted or limited in scope. [[User:Blueboar|Blueboar]] ([[User talk:Blueboar|talk]]) 01:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC) |
Since this list indicates that it includes any Tom, Dick and Harry who forms a Grand Lodge... I have added a few fringe groups that claim to be Masons. More to come, unless the article is either deleted or limited in scope. [[User:Blueboar|Blueboar]] ([[User talk:Blueboar|talk]]) 01:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
:Your personal view may be getting the better of you. I don't think we should be making any changes to the page until we have come to an agreement on wither deleting or keeping. Making changes at this point alters the content of the article from the original point of deletion. If the article is voted on as a keep, then go ahead and bloat it with all the information you want. After, we can put it back up for a deletion. I have not reverted your submition. [[User:Zef|Zef]] ([[User talk:Zef|talk]]) 14:22, 2 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:22, 2 June 2008
| Freemasonry | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
GFDL origin
This article began as a partial translation from the french wikipedia:
--Christophe Dioux (talk) 18:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Some small loonies added
Since this list indicates that it includes any Tom, Dick and Harry who forms a Grand Lodge... I have added a few fringe groups that claim to be Masons. More to come, unless the article is either deleted or limited in scope. Blueboar (talk) 01:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Your personal view may be getting the better of you. I don't think we should be making any changes to the page until we have come to an agreement on wither deleting or keeping. Making changes at this point alters the content of the article from the original point of deletion. If the article is voted on as a keep, then go ahead and bloat it with all the information you want. After, we can put it back up for a deletion. I have not reverted your submition. Zef (talk) 14:22, 2 June 2008 (UTC)