Template talk:Witchcraft: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Midnightblueowl (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | |||
==Delete== |
|||
| ⚫ | what is the point of creating a template with lots of redlinks, apparently with no intention to ever write the articles linked? I created redirects now, but this template should really be altered to link to a useful collection of existing articles, not to what somebody at some point thought would be useful to have. [[User:Dbachmann|dab]] <small>[[User_talk:Dbachmann|(𒁳)]]</small> 08:51, 26 July 2007 (UTC) |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | :what is the point of creating a template with lots of redlinks, apparently with no intention to ever write the articles linked? I created redirects now, but this template should really be altered to link to a useful collection of existing articles, not to what somebody at some point thought would be useful to have. [[User:Dbachmann|dab]] <small>[[User_talk:Dbachmann|(𒁳)]]</small> 08:51, 26 July 2007 (UTC) |
||
::The template has since been filled up, rendering this need for deletion obsolete. ([[User:Midnightblueowl|Midnightblueowl]] ([[User talk:Midnightblueowl|talk]]) 19:36, 18 February 2008 (UTC)) |
|||
Revision as of 19:36, 18 February 2008
Delete
Delete becuase there is only one article with useful information (European witchcraft) — Stevey7788 (talk) 01:01, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
- what is the point of creating a template with lots of redlinks, apparently with no intention to ever write the articles linked? I created redirects now, but this template should really be altered to link to a useful collection of existing articles, not to what somebody at some point thought would be useful to have. dab (𒁳) 08:51, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
- The template has since been filled up, rendering this need for deletion obsolete. (Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:36, 18 February 2008 (UTC))