Koenraad Elst: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Tuncrypt (talk | contribs)
Bakasuprman (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Koenraad Elst''' is a [[Belgian]] [[writer]] and [[orientalist]] (without [[Academic institution|institutional]] affiliation).
'''Koenraad Elst''' is a [[Belgian]] [[writer]] and [[orientalist]] (without [[Academic institution|institutional]] affiliation). He has authored fifteen books on topics related to [[Hinduism]], [[Indian history]], and [[Indian politics]].
He was an editor of the [[New Right]] Flemish nationalist journal ''[[TeKoS|Teksten, Kommentaren en Studies]]'' from 1992 to 1995, focussing on [[criticism of Islam]], and wrote for various other conservativist and [[Flemish separatist]] publications such as ''Nucleus'', ''[['t Pallieterke]]'', ''Secessie'' and ''[[The Brussels Journal]]''.
He has authored fifteen [[English language]] books on topics related to [[Hinduism]], [[Indian history]], and [[Indian politics]].


== Biography ==
== Biography ==
Line 22: Line 20:
He has described himself as "a secular humanist with an active interest in religions, particularly [[Taoism]] and [[Hinduism]], and keeping a close watch on the variegated [[Neopaganism|Pagan]] revival in Europe."<ref>[http://koenraadelst.bharatvani.org/articles/chr/missionaries.html bharatvani.org op. cit.]</ref>
He has described himself as "a secular humanist with an active interest in religions, particularly [[Taoism]] and [[Hinduism]], and keeping a close watch on the variegated [[Neopaganism|Pagan]] revival in Europe."<ref>[http://koenraadelst.bharatvani.org/articles/chr/missionaries.html bharatvani.org op. cit.]</ref>


He has not adopted Hinduism: "I am neither a [[Hindu]] nor a nationalist. And I don’t need to belong to those or to any specific ideological categories in order to use my eyes and ears."<ref>[http://koenraadelst.bharatvani.org/interviews/sulekha.html Elst interview]</ref> And he wrote: "However, I do readily admit to being a '[[Fellow traveller|fellow-traveller]]' of [[Dharmic religion|Dharmic civilization]] in its struggle for survival against the ongoing aggression and subversion by well-organized hostile ideologies."<ref>[http://koenraadelst.voiceofdharma.com/reviews/saffronwave.html Voice of Dharma review]</ref> This admission extends to his political sympathies; "Rest assured that in Hindutva circles, many people count as far more important than I."<ref>[http://koenraadelst.voiceofdharma.org/articles/fascism/PolSec03AyubKhan1.html]</ref> He resists any attempts at direct association with the [[Sangh Parivar]], however, calling his ideology 'Hindu Revivalism'.
He has not adopted Hinduism: "I am neither a [[Hindu]] nor a nationalist. And I don’t need to belong to those or to any specific ideological categories in order to use my eyes and ears."<ref>[http://koenraadelst.bharatvani.org/interviews/sulekha.html Elst interview]</ref> And he wrote: "However, I do readily admit to being a [[Fellow traveller|fellow-traveller]] of [[Dharmic religion|Dharmic civilization]] in its struggle for survival against the ongoing aggression and subversion by well-organized hostile ideologies."<ref>[http://koenraadelst.voiceofdharma.com/reviews/saffronwave.html Voice of Dharma review]</ref> This admission extends to his political sympathies; "Rest assured that in Hindutva circles, many people count as far more important than I."<ref>[http://koenraadelst.voiceofdharma.org/articles/fascism/PolSec03AyubKhan1.html]</ref> He resists any attempts at direct association with the [[Sangh Parivar]], however, calling his ideology 'Hindu Revivalism'.


Elst had for some years a leftist phase, and had also some interest in the New Age movement, though he writes that by 1985 he had had enough of the "superficiality and flakiness" of the New Age scene.<ref>[http://koenraadelst.bharatvani.org/articles/politics/bogey.html Hinduism, Environmentalism and the Nazi Bogey]</ref> In the 1990s he became interested in the European [[Neopagan]] movement, and wrote for some Neopagan publications until 1998.<ref>[http://koenraadelst.bharatvani.org/articles/politics/bogey.html Hinduism, Environmentalism and the Nazi Bogey]</ref>
Elst had for some years a leftist phase, and had also some interest in the New Age movement, though he writes that by 1985 he had had enough of the "superficiality and flakiness" of the New Age scene.<ref>[http://koenraadelst.bharatvani.org/articles/politics/bogey.html Hinduism, Environmentalism and the Nazi Bogey]</ref> In the 1990s he became interested in the European [[Neopagan]] movement, and wrote for some Neopagan publications until 1998.<ref>[http://koenraadelst.bharatvani.org/articles/politics/bogey.html Hinduism, Environmentalism and the Nazi Bogey]</ref>
Line 58: Line 56:
*India's Only Communalist: an Introduction to the Work of Sita Ram Goel. In "Hinduism and Secularism: After Ayodhya", Arvind Sharma (ed.) Palgrave 2001 ISBN 0-33 79406-0
*India's Only Communalist: an Introduction to the Work of Sita Ram Goel. In "Hinduism and Secularism: After Ayodhya", Arvind Sharma (ed.) Palgrave 2001 ISBN 0-33 79406-0
*"Banning Hindu Revaluation", Observer of Business and Politics, 1-12-1993,
*"Banning Hindu Revaluation", Observer of Business and Politics, 1-12-1993,
*“Een geslaagde Multi­culturele Samenleving: India” ("A failed multicultural coexistence: India") Tekos, Wijnegem : Deltapers, 1995-1997.
*''De islam, hoelang nog ? : Vlaamse polemieken over de islam'' ("Islam - how much longer? Flemish polemics on Islam") Wijnegem : Delta-Stichting, 2002. (TeKos nr. 15) ISBN 90-71455-17-3 [http://koenraadelst.bharatvani.org/articles/dutch/islamboek1.html]
*''De tanende democratie in België'', Secessie Kwartaalblad voor de Studie van Separatisme en Directe Democratie[http://www.secessie.nu/pdf/16-5.pdf] (2004)
*''De islam voor ongelovigen'' ("Islm for infidels") Stichting Deltapers, TeKoS nr. 5 (1997)


== Notes ==
== Notes ==
Line 105: Line 99:
*[http://koenraadelst.bharatvani.org/articles/fascism/PolSec03AyubKhan1.html A reply to A. Khan (above) by K. Elst]
*[http://koenraadelst.bharatvani.org/articles/fascism/PolSec03AyubKhan1.html A reply to A. Khan (above) by K. Elst]


{{DEFAULTSORT:Elst, Koenraad}}
[[Category:1959 births|Elst, Koenraad]]
[[Category:1959 births]]
[[Category:Living people|Elst, Koenraad]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:Belgian Indologists|Elst, Koenraad]]
[[Category:Belgian Indologists]]
[[Category:Flemish writers|Elst, Koenraad]]
[[Category:Belgian journalists]]
[[Category:Belgian journalists|Elst, Koenraad]]
[[Category:Belgian political writers]]
[[Category:Islamic politics and Islamic world studies|Elst, Koenraad]]
[[Category:Flemish writers]]
[[Category:Political writers|Elst, Koenraad]]
[[Category:Islamic politics and Islamic world studies]]
[[Category:Banaras Hindu University alumni|Elst, Koenraad]]
[[Category:Banaras Hindu University alumni]]
[[Category:Leuven alumni|Elst, Koenraad]]
[[Category:Leuven alumni]]
[[Category:New Right (Europe)]]
[[Category:Islam critical scholars]]


[[de:Koenraad Elst]]
[[de:Koenraad Elst]]

Revision as of 01:00, 26 November 2007

Koenraad Elst is a Belgian writer and orientalist (without institutional affiliation). He has authored fifteen books on topics related to Hinduism, Indian history, and Indian politics.

Biography

Template:Hindu politicsHe was born in Leuven, Belgium, on 7 August 1959, into a Flemish Catholic family. He graduated in Indology, Sinology and Philosophy at the Catholic University of Leuven. He then obtained a Ph.D. from the same university. The main portion of his Ph.D. dissertation on Hindu revivalism and Hindu reform movements eventually became his book Decolonizing the Hindu Mind. Other parts of his Ph.D. thesis were published in Who is a Hindu and The Saffron Swastika. He also studied at the Banaras Hindu University in India. Several of his books have been published by Voice of India.

During a stay at the Banaras Hindu University between 1988 and 1992, he interviewed many Indian leaders and writers.[1] He wrote his first book about the Ayodhya conflict. While establishing himself as a columnist for a number of Belgian and Indian papers, he frequently returned to India to study various aspects of its ethno-religio-political configuration and interview Hindu and other leaders and thinkers.

In 1989, Elst met Sita Ram Goel after reading Goel's book History of Hindu Christian Encounters. Elst later sent Goel a manuscript of his first book Ram Janmabhoomi Vs. Babri Masjid: A Case Study in Hindu Muslim Conflict. Goel was impressed with Elst's script: "I could not stop after I started reading it. I took it to Ram Swarup the same evening. He read it during the night and rang me up next morning. Koenraad Elst's book, he said, should be published immediately."[2] In August 1990, L. K. Advani released Koenraad Elst's book about the Ayodhya conflict at a public function.[3]

He has also written about multiculturalism, language policy issues, ancient Chinese history and philosophy, comparative religion, and the Aryan invasion debate. Elst became a well-known author on Indian politics during the 1990s in parallel with the BJP's rise to prominence on the national stage.

Opinions

Elst has written at length about fascism and totalitarianism in India and the West. His book The Saffron Swastika analyses the rhetoric of "Hindu fascism". He argues that "while one should always be vigilant for traces of totalitarianism in any ideology or movement, the obsession with fascism in the anti-Hindu rhetoric of the secularists is not the product of an analysis of the data, but of their own political compulsions."[4]

Influences

Elst has published in English and Dutch. He contributed for example to the conservative magazine Nucleus.[5] He is also a contributor to the "conservative-libertarian" internet magazine The Brussels Journal, the Flemish satirical weekly 't Pallieterke and other Belgian & Dutch publications. He has also written for mainstream Indian magazines like Outlook India. He wrote a postcript to a book written by American neoconservative and middle-east scholar Daniel Pipes (The Rushdie Affair: The Novel, the Ayatollah, and the West). He has also published critiques of Islamism in the West.[6]

He has described himself as "a secular humanist with an active interest in religions, particularly Taoism and Hinduism, and keeping a close watch on the variegated Pagan revival in Europe."[7]

He has not adopted Hinduism: "I am neither a Hindu nor a nationalist. And I don’t need to belong to those or to any specific ideological categories in order to use my eyes and ears."[8] And he wrote: "However, I do readily admit to being a “fellow-traveller” of Dharmic civilization in its struggle for survival against the ongoing aggression and subversion by well-organized hostile ideologies."[9] This admission extends to his political sympathies; "Rest assured that in Hindutva circles, many people count as far more important than I."[10] He resists any attempts at direct association with the Sangh Parivar, however, calling his ideology 'Hindu Revivalism'.

Elst had for some years a leftist phase, and had also some interest in the New Age movement, though he writes that by 1985 he had had enough of the "superficiality and flakiness" of the New Age scene.[11] In the 1990s he became interested in the European Neopagan movement, and wrote for some Neopagan publications until 1998.[12]

Bibliography

Notes

See also

Reviews

Controversies