Template talk:Roman provinces AD 117: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Panairjdde~enwiki (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It says '''circa''' 120 AD; the link clealry goes to 117 AD, when Mesopotamia ''was'' a province. And I agree that those missing privnces need a page of their own, but until they get one, it's betetr to have them link to something than be empty. [[User:Kuralyov|Kuralyov]] 23:20, 14 May 2005 (UTC) |
It says '''circa''' 120 AD; the link clealry goes to 117 AD, when Mesopotamia ''was'' a province. And I agree that those missing privnces need a page of their own, but until they get one, it's betetr to have them link to something than be empty. [[User:Kuralyov|Kuralyov]] 23:20, 14 May 2005 (UTC) |
||
:Can you cite a source for Mesopotamia as province in 120? It is not present in [[Roman_province#List_of_Roman_provinces_in_117_AD]], nor in [[:Image:Roman Empire Map.png]]--[[User:Panairjdde|Panairjdde]] 07:07, 16 May 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 07:07, 16 May 2005
It says circa 120 AD; the link clealry goes to 117 AD, when Mesopotamia was a province. And I agree that those missing privnces need a page of their own, but until they get one, it's betetr to have them link to something than be empty. Kuralyov 23:20, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
- Can you cite a source for Mesopotamia as province in 120? It is not present in Roman_province#List_of_Roman_provinces_in_117_AD, nor in Image:Roman Empire Map.png--Panairjdde 07:07, 16 May 2005 (UTC)