Draft talk:Nintendo Switch 2: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Redrose64 (talk | contribs)
far too soon for an RfC
2603:8001:6940:2100:db46:4a53:b9ab:7218 (talk)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


==Draft size==
==Draft size==
{{Ping| Fantastic Mr. Fox}} the new title is more speculative than the old one and does not meet the article titles policy. Futhermore, the lead section is also more speculative, and we need the contrivesses section.
Should the draft be smaller?
If so, which version?
 

# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Next_Nintendo_Console&diff=prev&oldid=1264292348 current version]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Next_Nintendo_Console&diff=prev&oldid=1264291496]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Next_Nintendo_Console&diff=prev&oldid=1264291329]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Next_Nintendo_Console&diff=prev&oldid=1264289233]
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Next_Nintendo_Console&diff=prev&oldid=1264196123 no]

started by [[Special:Contributions/2603:8001:6940:2100:AD8A:8E4:AC11:BE50|2603:8001:6940:2100:AD8A:8E4:AC11:BE50]] ([[User talk:2603:8001:6940:2100:AD8A:8E4:AC11:BE50|talk]]) 18:18, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
:I've pulled the {{tlx|rfc}} tag here, primarily because there is zero indication that [[WP:RFCBEFORE]] has been satisfied. Also, I don't see why a normal talk page discussion could not resolve the issue, if indeed there ''is'' any issue here - I've deen smaller drafts, and plenty that were larger - or much larger. Basically: this is far too trivial a matter for a full-blown thirty-day formal [[WP:RFC]]. --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] &#x1f339; ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 12:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:12, 22 December 2024

Draft size

@Fantastic Mr. Fox: the new title is more speculative than the old one and does not meet the article titles policy. Futhermore, the lead section is also more speculative, and we need the contrivesses section.