Template talk:Sheffield: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Warofdreams (talk | contribs)
Template is very large
 
JeremyA (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The template is very large. Is there a need for it? If there is, perhaps one for areas of Sheffield would suffice - the list of buildings, landmarks and locations is highly arbitrary and best suited to a category. [[User:Warofdreams|Warofdreams]] 11:10, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The template is very large. Is there a need for it? If there is, perhaps one for areas of Sheffield would suffice - the list of buildings, landmarks and locations is highly arbitrary and best suited to a category. [[User:Warofdreams|Warofdreams]] 11:10, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
* You're right, it is large. I originally thought just to do the districts, but I added in the buildings etc... as an after-thought. I've sat on this idea for a couple of weeks, but decided that rather than procrastinate I should just make the template and see what people think. My original thoughts stemmed from the fact that these two lists are currently on the Sheffield page where they stand out like a sore thumb. I wasn't sure what (if anything) to do with them and then, in my browsing of other wikipedia, I found a number of cities (eg [[Birmingham]], [[Chicago]]) that have templates for their districts. I think that for these cities it gives a unified feeling when browsing through the districts of a city and I think that it would be good if the same were true for Sheffield. Maybe the whole thing is already adequately covered by the Sheffield category. That is why, rather than just going round attaching it to all the Sheffield articles, I have just attached it to a few and asked for comments. [[User:JeremyA|JeremyA]] 04:27, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:27, 3 April 2005

The template is very large. Is there a need for it? If there is, perhaps one for areas of Sheffield would suffice - the list of buildings, landmarks and locations is highly arbitrary and best suited to a category. Warofdreams 11:10, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • You're right, it is large. I originally thought just to do the districts, but I added in the buildings etc... as an after-thought. I've sat on this idea for a couple of weeks, but decided that rather than procrastinate I should just make the template and see what people think. My original thoughts stemmed from the fact that these two lists are currently on the Sheffield page where they stand out like a sore thumb. I wasn't sure what (if anything) to do with them and then, in my browsing of other wikipedia, I found a number of cities (eg Birmingham, Chicago) that have templates for their districts. I think that for these cities it gives a unified feeling when browsing through the districts of a city and I think that it would be good if the same were true for Sheffield. Maybe the whole thing is already adequately covered by the Sheffield category. That is why, rather than just going round attaching it to all the Sheffield articles, I have just attached it to a few and asked for comments. JeremyA 04:27, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)