User talk:General Ization: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Undid edits by Koseh nanat (talk) to last revision by General Ization
Tags: Undo Reverted SWViewer [1.4]
Koseh nanat (talk | contribs)
Undid revision 1110183384 by Tropicalkitty (talk)
Tags: Undo Reverted Non-autoconfirmed user rapidly reverting edits Possible vandalism
Line 18: Line 18:
| background= white
| background= white
}}
}}
<center>[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|50px|alt=Stop icon]]<br />'''If I have nominated your article for [[WP:AFD|deletion]], removed your content or [[WP:REVERT|reverted]] your change and you would like to know why,<br /> please review the following Wikipedia policies and guidelines, among others that may be mentioned in a message I left on your Talk page:'''
<center>[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|50px|alt=Stop icon]]<br />'''I am a virgin.'''
{{col-begin|width=50%}}
{{col-begin|width=50%}}
|-
|-
Line 111: Line 111:
In regard to the edits of {{noping|GilaNola}} you reverted, see [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:C.Fred&diff=prev&oldid=1110027031 this message] left by {{noping|Jacera}} at my user talk page. It seems highly likely to me that the two accounts are connected. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 11:15, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
In regard to the edits of {{noping|GilaNola}} you reverted, see [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:C.Fred&diff=prev&oldid=1110027031 this message] left by {{noping|Jacera}} at my user talk page. It seems highly likely to me that the two accounts are connected. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 11:15, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
:{{re|C.Fred}} Yes, although they seem to disagree on the subject's birth year. <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:140;">[[User:General Ization|<span style="color: #006633;">General <i>Ization</i></span>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:General Ization|<i style="color: #000666;">Talk </i>]] </sup> 17:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
:{{re|C.Fred}} Yes, although they seem to disagree on the subject's birth year. <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:140;">[[User:General Ization|<span style="color: #006633;">General <i>Ization</i></span>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:General Ization|<i style="color: #000666;">Talk </i>]] </sup> 17:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further warning''' the next time you make [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|personal attacks]] on other people, as you did at [[:User talk:General Ization]]. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.<!-- Template:uw-npa4 --> <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:140;">[[User:General Ization|<span style="color: #006633;">General <i>Ization</i></span>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:General Ization|<i style="color: #000666;">Talk </i>]] </sup> 02:54, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:04, 14 September 2022


PLEASE READ

Stop icon
I am a virgin.

Punjab, Pakistan

For last 30 days, I have been fixing the literacy rate and HDI of Punjab, Pakistan which is 66.3% and 0.564 respectively according to the given references but someone again mess up with them. Therefore, I had no other option but to remove literacy and HDI so no one can mess with it. So I request you to fix the literacy rate and HDI. Also, lock the Punjab, Pakistan wiki page Salman1911k (talk) 08:16, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request mis-templated

I'm hunting down policies, and your response template to Talk:Donald Trump#Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 17 August 2022 was incorrect, as what the user requested is basically identical to one of our example edit requests. The better option for the Talk page appearance would seem to me to be that I contact you directly about this and let you decide if you want to remedy it. A proper template would have been {{subst:Ep|n}} followed by an appropriate explanation to the effect of: "Sources are not required to be cited inline in the lead section when the information is well-attributed in the article body," perhaps with a section link or ref number to boot. Remember, for many readers the edit request may be their first interaction with the "community experience" of Wikipedia, so official-looking action especially should have every appearance of due consideration and care. SamuelRiv (talk) 22:34, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My response was correct for the simple reason that "The last line of the main page before edits" does not identify exactly what content the editor was referring to and proposed be changed. Are you sure you're writing concerning my response? Another editor responded shortly after me advising that the content that editor believed they were referring to was present by consensus. General Ization Talk 23:03, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).

Guideline and policy news

  • A discussion is open to define a process by which Vector 2022 can be made the default for all users.
  • An RfC is open to gain consensus on whether Fox News is reliable for science and politics.

Technical news

  • The impact report on the effects of disabling IP editing on the Persian (Farsi) Wikipedia has been released.
  • The WMF is looking into making a Private Incident Reporting System (PIRS) system to improve the reporting of harmful incidents through easier and safer reporting. You can leave comments on the talk page by answering the questions provided. Users who have faced harmful situations are also invited to join a PIRS interview to share the experience. To sign up please email Madalina Ana.

Arbitration

  • An arbitration case regarding Conduct in deletion-related editing has been closed. The Arbitration Committee passed a remedy as part of the final decision to create a request for comment (RfC) on how to handle mass nominations at Articles for Deletion (AfD).
  • The arbitration case request Jonathunder has been automatically closed after a 6 month suspension of the case.

Miscellaneous

  • The new pages patrol (NPP) team has prepared an appeal to the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) for assistance with addressing Page Curation bugs and requested features. You are encouraged to read the open letter before it is sent, and if you support it, consider signing it. It is not a discussion, just a signature will suffice.
  • Voting for candidates for the Wikimedia Board of Trustees is open until 6 September.

Oh noes

Snitches are rewarded! Protonk (talk) 05:47, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Protonk: You don't get to damage the project because you think you were slighted by @Bbb23. Keep it up and you'll have your own section at ANI. General Ization Talk 05:51, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ok. Protonk (talk) 05:53, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Observation about the Rajacenna article

In regard to the edits of GilaNola you reverted, see this message left by Jacera at my user talk page. It seems highly likely to me that the two accounts are connected. —C.Fred (talk) 11:15, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred: Yes, although they seem to disagree on the subject's birth year. General Ization Talk 17:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:General Ization. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. General Ization Talk 02:54, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]