Talk:HMS Sheffield (D80): Difference between revisions
Piledhigheranddeeper (talk | contribs) →False-friendly fire?: new section |
Wee Curry Monster (talk | contribs) →False-friendly fire?: Reply |
||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
I vaguely remember reading that one of the problems experienced by the ''Sheffield'' was that its missile-defense systems had been programmed to ignore friendly missiles, and the Exocet, being French, was seen as "friendly" (thanks to the expected response to a Soviet attack) and not dangerous. Am I wrong in that? --[[User:Piledhigheranddeeper|Piledhigheranddeeper]] ([[User talk:Piledhigheranddeeper|talk]]) 14:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC) |
I vaguely remember reading that one of the problems experienced by the ''Sheffield'' was that its missile-defense systems had been programmed to ignore friendly missiles, and the Exocet, being French, was seen as "friendly" (thanks to the expected response to a Soviet attack) and not dangerous. Am I wrong in that? --[[User:Piledhigheranddeeper|Piledhigheranddeeper]] ([[User talk:Piledhigheranddeeper|talk]]) 14:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC) |
||
:Yes it is nonsense, the ESM system on Sheffield, had it not been transmitting on SATCOM would have classified the Exocet as a threat. <span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Wee Curry Monster|W]][[Special:contributions/Wee Curry Monster|C]][[User talk:Wee Curry Monster|M]]</span><sub>[[Special:EmailUser/Wee Curry Monster|email]]</sub> 14:55, 4 May 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:55, 4 May 2022
| This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on HMS Sheffield (D80). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070425070019/http://www.fuerzaaerea.mil.ar/conflicto/dias/may04b.html to http://www.fuerzaaerea.mil.ar/conflicto/dias/may04b.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071212000955/http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/D5E979F4-CD1D-4626-86B5-F432355861EA/0/phase2_part2_narrative_of_attach.pdf to http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/D5E979F4-CD1D-4626-86B5-F432355861EA/0/phase2_part2_narrative_of_attach.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:38, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
New sections
An attempt to get a bit more structure into the article to make it an easier read. Still needs work though... - Snori (talk) 04:52, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Cite for synthetic clothing in uniforms
[1] I was planning to add but having problems with the tool to convert to a reference. Save for later or for any kind soul to do in the mean time. WCMemail 10:54, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- But it doesn't mention Sheffield explicitly. Maybe better to put this with this reference into the main Falkland War article? --Ozzy (talk) 12:23, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
False-friendly fire?
I vaguely remember reading that one of the problems experienced by the Sheffield was that its missile-defense systems had been programmed to ignore friendly missiles, and the Exocet, being French, was seen as "friendly" (thanks to the expected response to a Soviet attack) and not dangerous. Am I wrong in that? --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 14:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- Yes it is nonsense, the ESM system on Sheffield, had it not been transmitting on SATCOM would have classified the Exocet as a threat. WCMemail 14:55, 4 May 2022 (UTC)




