Television: Stations Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Video games C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Archives

Index Archive 1

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 1.

I think we've found the source of the vandalism issue. Hawkatana (talk) 21:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, seems likely. Hopefully the protection request gets approved soon. -- MacAddct1984 ^{(talk | contribs)} 21:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Under the controversy section this is said

• While her speech received praise from some viewers along with her G4 co-hosts and staff, there was backlash from a large portion of viewers who viewed her comments as a form of retaliation, after they had exposed Frosk as having reported several pieces of incorrect information.

I can't find any reference to incorrect information in the sources provided. Where is this information coming from? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.169.139.68 (talk) 19:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely nothing. This is made up nonsense from gamergaters desperately trying to become relevant again, because they can't seem to get the message that they are yesterday's news. 46.97.170.225 (talk) 11:29, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• So seems to me g4 is playing defense game here? Why not address whatever the concern is from the viewers? I think protecting the wiki from word changes might not have the effect one is looking for here. Just a thought. 2600:1005:B1DA:C027:B464:9D03:2EB0:B740 (talk) 23:35, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • A bunch of whiny manbabies obsessed with a "culture war" that isn't even real throwing a temper-tantrum isn't "concern from the viewers". You can quit sealioning, you're not fooling anyone. --Hawkatana (talk) 19:49, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]