Talk:Che Guevara: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Che Guevara/Archive 21) (bot
rmv, see WP:Forum
Line 108: Line 108:


:It's ok to disagree with Guevara without automatically believing everything negative that is written about him, this article is solidly based on the most reliable sources on Guevara written by respectable historians. If anything it leans a leans a little anti, as a lot of the academic scholarship in English has something of a right-wing bias, but wikipedia's job is to reflect the available scholarship. [[User:Boynamedsue|Boynamedsue]] ([[User talk:Boynamedsue|talk]]) 05:42, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
:It's ok to disagree with Guevara without automatically believing everything negative that is written about him, this article is solidly based on the most reliable sources on Guevara written by respectable historians. If anything it leans a leans a little anti, as a lot of the academic scholarship in English has something of a right-wing bias, but wikipedia's job is to reflect the available scholarship. [[User:Boynamedsue|Boynamedsue]] ([[User talk:Boynamedsue|talk]]) 05:42, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
== physician?? ==
Che was a vagrant, a sadist and a murderer; but he was no physician - why is this falsehood in the lede? [[Special:Contributions/158.123.57.63|158.123.57.63]] ([[User talk:158.123.57.63|talk]]) 14:25, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:28, 31 October 2021

Template:Vital article Template:Not a forum

Former featured articleChe Guevara is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articleChe Guevara has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 18, 2006.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 3, 2004Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 3, 2004Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 16, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
December 19, 2005Good article nomineeListed
March 10, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
April 23, 2008Featured article reviewDemoted
August 28, 2009Good article nomineeListed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 8, 2004, October 8, 2005, October 8, 2006, October 7, 2009, October 7, 2010, October 8, 2011, and October 8, 2013.
Current status: Former featured article, current good article

el Che

CTR+F and search for "el che"; my point is that his monicker, war name, nickname, or whatever, in spanish is El Che; The Che, not just Che. Thoughts?

Photo Opportunity

May I suggest the account of the photo op is modified to reflect the fact that many who were present deny that the photo is genuine. This is reflected in the article on Rodriguez. This article might be an appropriate citation - https://www.dnaindia.com/world/report-documentary-alleges-last-photo-of-che-is-fake-1126943

Use of the term "peasant army guide" to describe Eutimio Guerra

There is a tendency on anti-Guevara websites to describe Eutimio Guerra as a "peasant army guide" who was murdered by Guevara. In reality he was a pro-Castrist guerrilla, acting mainly as a guide, who was executed after working with the government forces, which the guerrillas classified as treason. The episode is known principally from Guevara's diaries here where he is described as acting as a guide for the rebels, and is mentioned in Luther's Critical Lives, which states his role with the rebels was mainly as a guide. I have amended the text to show this. Boynamedsue (talk) 08:19, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Che was a racist homophobic mass murderer

Why are the concentration camps he created for gay and disabled people left out of this article? Why is there no mention of his anti-black or anti-native racist rhetoric and policies? This article looks like it was written by some 19 year old hipster. WTF! (unsigned by IP)

The "concentration camps he created for gay and disabled people" didn't exist. There was some persecution of gay people by the Cuban government in the late 1960's, but Guevara was already outside of the country when this had started, so it can't reasonably be put in the article. It's worth remembering, this was at a time when the British government was still arresting people for homosexual activity.
Guevara's only anti-black statements on record are those he made as very young man when travelling through South America. For an Argentine man born in the 20's, he was about as anti-racist as it's possible to be. See here for an analysis. There is no record of any anti-black policies by Guevara, so no mention of this appears in the article.
As for mass murderer, yes, he killed deserters and traitors in cold blood. That is in the article. After the war he was responsible for executing members of the Batista forces who had committed atrocities. That's in the article. We could ask what the US and UK governments did to deserters and traitors during WWII? The answer is that they executed them. The trials of Batista's soldiers and secret police were explicitly modelled on the Nuremberg trials.
It's ok to disagree with Guevara without automatically believing everything negative that is written about him, this article is solidly based on the most reliable sources on Guevara written by respectable historians. If anything it leans a leans a little anti, as a lot of the academic scholarship in English has something of a right-wing bias, but wikipedia's job is to reflect the available scholarship. Boynamedsue (talk) 05:42, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]