Hello, Polish kurd. Thank you for your work on Third Republic Movement. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:01, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Re this edit, could you detail at Talk:1993 Polish parliamentary election#Senate vote figures which lists you combined into independents and local lists? Cheers, Number 57 15:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2000 Polish presidential election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jan Łopuszański.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. I understand that you’re an expert at the history and politics of Poland. If you’re interested you could write a section on Polish conservatism in the main article on conservatism under the ”National variants” section—after Norway and before Russia. I was recently thinking of finding someone who could do this and you seem to be the right man for the job. Trakking (talk) 14:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then, of course, there’s the potential work of creating an entire article named Conservatism in Poland, which could give a more comprehensive presentation of the topic. There are many nations that already have their own article on conservatism. Trakking (talk) 15:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will add a section, but it won't be too long or detailed. Polish kurd (talk) 16:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work. Poland is a patriotic and heroic nation that deserves to be represented in the article. Trakking (talk) 21:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just an FYI, article titles do not have to be the 'correct' translation of a party's name. What matters is how the party is generally referred to in English. For example, the Danish Social Liberal Party is a completely different name to its Danish one ('The Radical Left'). Cheers, Number 57 03:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware, but it's quite a niche party and I reckon someone just mistranslated it to that from Polish. Polish kurd (talk) 12:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome Polish kurd! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland, joining the project, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with our community.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you get the seat breakdown within the Centrolew allianc? Can you add it as a source to the table. Cheers, Number 57 15:31, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I admit I just took them from the infobox. While I don't know what source that uses, I also know that this entire election page is just barely accurate in terms of the statistics. I have atleast two sources that give a few numbers differently from Nohlen & Stöver, and I'm still looking for more sources on this election. Anyways, I believe the entire page is to be redone eventually, I just thought about including numbers from the infobox in the table. Polish kurd (talk) 15:46, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, seems like the infobox cites Polish wikipedia which cites "Główny Urząd Statystyczny Rzeczypospolitej Polski, Statystyka Polski, seria C, z. 4, s. XXX.", I will include that in the table. Polish kurd (talk) 17:19, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you able to access the source? Based on my experience, I would suggest never trusting a source unless you can verify the content yourself (false representation is unfortunately very common - yesterday I noticed someone had used a source to claim a party won all the seats in an election - the source didn't say anything of the sort, and it turned out they had seen the claim made on Wikipedia and then apparently just added a random source to support the claim...). I found a few Polish sources for the election, but they all assert Centrolew won 82 seats (the seat numbers for the two PSL parties and SCh are the same, but they have PPS with 24 and NPR with 10)... Cheers, Number 57 19:52, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think I found the GUS report it's referring to^[1], it also seems to assert that PPS won 24 and NPR won 10 (and that BBWR got 247) - however, Polish wikipedia also notes that some sources presenting the results for the parliamenary election claim Centrolew won not 79 but 82 seats, and that the difference comes from the fact that three representatives (two for NPR, one for PPS, so it checks out) that won seats on other electoral lists immediately joined the PPS/NPR club. I'm not sure if two of those defections were indeed from BBWR, and I'm not sure where the third one could have come from. Full data from GUS: 247 for BBWR, 62 for SN, 48 for the peasants' parties, 10 for NPR, 24 for PPS, 15 for PSChD, 18 for the Ukrainian parliamentary club, 6 for the Jewish parliamentary club, 5 for the German parliamentary club. Honestly, it might not be the best source. Another source I have also gives numbers different from the wikipedia page, though that also gives a different amount of votes for Centrolew - I'll note wikipedia also seems to not know all the parties that participated in Centrolew, neither do I. I think it's best to just wait for someone (probably me) to redo the entire 1930 parliametnary election page and get correct sources like that, and to leave the infobox and table as is for the time being, as it seems to be generally correct after having adjusted actual seats won from lists, though that might be original research by whoever made the numbers on Polish wikipedia. Polish kurd (talk) 23:05, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The other interwar elections also seem to have similarly dubiously accurate data - especially 1919, 1935, 1938 Polish kurd (talk) 23:10, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to National-Christian Labour Union. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:17, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The page is a translation from plwiki. It has a source in the bibliography. Polish kurd (talk) 16:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Polish kurd. I've deleted the edit summary you left at 2025 Polish presidential election as being grossly insulting. Please do not use that kind of language again in the future. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 21:26, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Acknowledged Polish kurd (talk) 21:34, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Central Union of Cultural and Economic Organizations. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:15, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1995 Polish presidential election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Left Alliance.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aldona Skirgiełło is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aldona Skirgiełło until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:58, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wiesław Lewicki (Normal Country) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiesław Lewicki (Normal Country) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 11:25, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Biejat is not a candidate Bildete (talk) 12:53, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, she is just now Bildete (talk) 13:09, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:28, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wojciech Papis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wojciech Papis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:21, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Polish Popular-Christian Forum "Patrimony". Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Moriwen (talk) 23:13, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe. This is a standard message to inform you that the Balkans or Eastern Europe is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:54, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Romuald Starosielec is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romuald Starosielec until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:33, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wiesław Lewicki (Normal Country) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiesław Lewicki (Normal Country) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:34, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. While reviewing new pages, I noticed that a page you created, Central Union of Cultural and Economic Organizations, does not appear to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines as a standalone article. As an alternative to deletion, I've redirected it to Belarusian_nationalism#In_Poland. If you disagree, feel free to revert my redirect and we can proceed to a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. (If you reply to me here, please ping me as I am not watching this page.) Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:28, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2025 Polish presidential election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civic Coalition.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Polish kurd. Thank you for your work on Maksymilian Malinowski. Another editor, Moriwen, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for the good translation work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Moriwen}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Moriwen (talk) 19:25, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The results aren’t final and I have refed the supreme court’s decision to recount votes. You reversed that without a comment Octilllion (talk) 13:57, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the official election results. Thanks @Octilllion Polish kurd (talk) 14:03, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The result hasn’t yet been confirmed by the Supreme Court and it has judged that for now there should be a partial recount. Therefore these official results you source are now outdated + not final :) Octilllion (talk) 14:07, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Besides you removed the link I put here as a source to back that up

Check the supreme court’s website. This article should be fully rewritten thanks to your grubby little fingers being all over it and manipulating content @Piotrus Octilllion (talk) 14:10, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.sn.pl/aktualnosci/SitePages/Wydarzenia.aspx?ItemSID=1091-0dc69815-3ade-42fa-bbb8-549c3c6969c5&ListName=Wydarzenia Octilllion (talk) 14:10, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.polsatnews.pl/wiadomosc/2025-06-12/bedzie-ponowne-liczenie-glosow-sad-najwyzszy-podjal-decyzje-ws-wyborow/

Sąd Najwyższy przekazał, że do przeliczenia głosów dojdzie w następujących komisjach:

• Obwodowej Komisji Wyborczej nr 95 w Krakowie,
• Obwodowej Komisji Wyborczej nr 3 w Oleśnie,
• Obwodowej Komisji nr 13 w Mińsku Mazowieckim,
• Obwodowej Komisji Wyborczej nr 9 w Strzelcach Opolskich,
• Obwodowej Komisji Wyborczej nr 25 w Grudziądzu,
• Obwodowej Komisji Wyborczej nr 17 w Gdańsku,
• Obwodowej Komisji Wyborczej nr 30 w Bielsku-Białej,
• Obwodowej Komisji Wyborczej nr 61 w Bielsku-Białej
• Obwodowej Komisji Wyborczej nr 10 w Tarnowie,
• Obwodowej Komisji Wyborczej nr 53 w Katowicach,
• Obwodowej Komisji Wyborczej nr 35 w Tychach,
• Obwodowej Komisji Wyborczej nr 6 w Kamiennej Górze,
• Obwodowej Komisji Wyborczej nr 4 w Brześciu Kujawskim.

Według doniesień mediów, do nieprawidłowości mogło dojść w kilkunastu komisjach, jednak wciąż błędy te nie wpłynęłyby na ostateczny wynik, ponieważ różnica pomiędzy obydwoma kandydatami wyniosła ponad 369 tysięcy głosów (Nawrocki zdobył 10 mln 606 tys. 877 głosów, Trzaskowski - 10 mln 237 tys. 286). Polish kurd (talk) 14:13, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Still the current “official” results are already outdated so remove them until the final tally. Also re add my reference to the supreme court ruling Octilllion (talk) 14:14, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you keep results from comissions that are currently being recounted lol. Octilllion (talk) 14:15, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I saw the edits and I am surprised that this is taking place.

We are to follow the official PKW results, and as of right now, they are still the same. The partial recount does not annul the results. This is also shown by the fact that Nawrocki received official certificate confirming his election just yesterday.

Wikipedia is not here to speculate or question the official results. You will need to expect reverts if you do that. Also keep in mind that it can come to WP:ANI in case of further disputes. Brat Forelli🦊 14:21, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We also have to follow official supreme court rulings because it is the Supreme Court that confirms the PKW’s results. Which have now been put into question Octilllion (talk) 14:23, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On Canadian election pages when there is a recount final count is wit-held until the results are made clear.

On every other Polish election page the supreme court is taken into account Octilllion (talk) 14:24, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Borgenland (talk) 14:42, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It started today on Monday June 16 and will run until Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:11, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you recommend any good resources on the topic of Polish political parties from the interwar period (1918-1939)? Csz13 (talk) 14:19, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Compared to the amount of literature on post-1989 political parties (I have several books), the quickest you'll find information on minor interwar parties is probably through them being mentioned and described in memoirs and biographies of politicians/literature on the general history of Poland/news articles and other contemporary descriptions of them. The major ones (PSL Piast, PSL Wyzwolenie, PPS, Endecja, Jewish organizations et cetera) have a lot more written about them in specific throughout the ages - for example Tomicki, Jan. Polska Partia Socjalistyczna 1892-1948. which is available for free if you look hard enough, on plwiki you find Molenda, Jan. Polskie Stronnictwo Ludowe w Królestwie Polskim. for PSL Wyzwolenie. But these are all in Polish. Finding more books about them seems easy enough. Apparently Norman Davies wrote something in English about the general history of interwar Poland but I never read that.

Election results for all parties are available at 1919 1922 1928 1930, but that's again in Polish @Csz13 Polish kurd (talk) 14:56, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dziękuję bardzo.

Umiem czytać po polsku, więc te zasoby też są dobre. Csz13 (talk) 16:54, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Próchnik, Adam. "Pierwsze piętnastolecie Polski niepodległej". is also very valuable as literature regarding interwar Polish political history @Csz13 Polish kurd (talk) 17:25, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Polish kurd. Thank you for your work on Border Defence Movement. Another editor, Uncle Bash007, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Congratulations and thank you for creating this page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Uncle Bash007}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Uncle Bash007 (talk) 14:57, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I acted on impulse which should not have happened and I apologize for that Nagito Komaeda the Second (talk) 21:58, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok. Just don't vandalize again, please. Polish kurd (talk) 22:01, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really do that unless something irritates me enough (still should have restrained myself) and with no intention of harm but let's not delve further into that, case closed.

More importantly, shouldn't this article be protected in some way given all the controversies, this article is vulnerable to emotional edits that don't adhere to Wikipedia like mine. That's not mentioning any kind of trolls and other people of this sort Nagito Komaeda the Second (talk) 22:05, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Opinion polling for the 1991 Polish parliamentary election. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:53, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone wondering just because they are a bit more center-right and liberal the Conservative People's Party (Poland) is still a conservative party. Coconut0330 (talk) 14:25, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SKL was born out of primarily MPs from liberal post-Solidarity formations and it does not belong to the group of other post-Solidarity conservative parties. @Coconut0330 Polish kurd (talk) 14:35, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to thank you for updating the Moldova graph when I wasn't able to.

Tip: If you want to stop the full stops in the legends from replacing spaces, slashes or other characters, edit the corresponding label in the scale_color_manual.

For example:

labels = c(party1,party2,"BA/MAN",party4,... BSMIsEditing (talk) 10:22, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the hint. If you want to put your (updated) one back there, go ahead. @BSMIsEditing Polish kurd (talk) 13:41, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No thanks. You can keep it there. BSMIsEditing (talk) 16:56, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#2025 Moldovan parliamentary election regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic 2025 Moldovan parliamentary election.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

--Basque mapping (talk) 09:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for fixing the citation on civic coaltion (party) article. Was fixing it but I saw that you already done that. <3 Slodkiszczur (talk) 19:50, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm contacting you because you handled my edit request last time. Could you make another change to Grzegorz Braun's page. The far-right label, right in the opening statement, is undue, and it is a duplicate as it already says "Braun has broadly been described as far-right" below. So would you mind removing far-right from the opening, in line with WP:LABEL? ~2025-33542-23 (talk) 11:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done Polish kurd (talk) 14:01, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Next Polish parliamentary election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PLN.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Polish kurd. Thank you for your work on Rafał Kasprzyk. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:44, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What advice can you give me on what should be done about the fact that the "Federation for the Republic" party has been replaced by the "Free Republicans" party? Did I describe it correctly in these articles, or is there anything else that needs to be improved? IgnacyPL (talk) 18:27, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would change the article name to Free Republicans (party) akin to Civic Coalition (party), since it's now the official name. Maybe make the first sentence read "The Free Republicans (polish:. ... WR), formerly Federation for the Republic (polish: ...) @IgnacyPL Polish kurd (talk) 18:35, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :) IgnacyPL (talk) 18:37, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've already done something about this, so could you please correct this article after me? You know this better than I do, and I'm not sure I wrote everything correctly. Thanks in advance IgnacyPL (talk) 18:47, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2026 Poland 2050 leadership election, a link pointing to the disambiguation page was Tweetadded.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:06, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2016 Democratic Left Alliance leadership election, a link pointing to the disambiguation page TVN was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, did I correctly describe some time ago what Polish deputy ministers with the rank of Secretary of state and Undersecretary of state do? Please check it out. Thanks in advance. It would be great if you also checked the article Deputy minister. IgnacyPL (talk) 19:01, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@IgnacyPL

well do you need to source it, and also fix the formatting. Polish kurd (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]