Hello, I'm Fanfanboy. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Christian Schwarzenegger—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. fanfanboy (block_talk) 16:02, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fanfanboy, I mainly wanted to complement the information on Christian Schwarzenegger and correct some errors. Kazoetarinai (talk) 16:08, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kazoetarinai. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Christian Schwarzenegger, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DACartman (talk) 17:26, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this additional information. I am relatively new to Wikipedia. Kazoetarinai (talk) 23:13, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Japan Writers' Association. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:54, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Indeed the text needs more references. Kazoetarinai (talk) 08:23, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoldRomean was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Japan Writers' Association and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoldRomean (talk) 20:12, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kazoetarinai! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoldRomean (talk) 20:12, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Richard (brand). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:14, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kazoetarinai,

Thank you for creating Shōda Kōhō.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I've reviewed the article, however it needs more reference (citations, sources, footnotes) - each claim (fact) should have a citation associated with it.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Netherzone (talk) 04:21, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kazoetarinai. Thank you for your work on Shōda Kōhō. Another editor, Netherzone, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article. I've reviewed it and it needs more inline citations to verify the content. Each claim (fact) should have a source (citation, footnote, reference) associated it for verification.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 04:22, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Netherzone: Hi Netherzone, I have revised the article on Shōda Kōhō adding references and inserting footnotes for all paragraphs. I hope it meets the quality requirements now. Kazoetarinai (talk) 20:06, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I saw your edits that improved the article. Cheers, Netherzone (talk) 20:07, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kazoetarinai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Soroimono, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kazoetarinai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Japan Writers' Association, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kazoetarinai. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Japan Writers' Association".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 20:25, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kazoetarinai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Richard (brand), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:09, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kazoetarinai. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Richard".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 21:24, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]