Hello, I'm Wiiformii. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Portal:Current events/2024 June 9, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wiiformii (talk) 23:44, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of disasters in Canada by death toll, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dakota, Lakota and Notre-Dame-du-Lac. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 2024 Doral shooting requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Johnj1995 (talk) 19:40, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 2024 Ma'ale Adumim attack requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:45, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 2024 Turbo Lance II crash requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:45, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop creating blank pages! They serve no purpose and are likely to be deleted. Please refrain from creating them; otherwise, you will be reported for disruption. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:55, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! I will not do it again Bloxzge 025 (talk) 17:57, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to 2024 Uttar Pradesh stampede, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Celjski Grad (talk) 05:58, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not update injury and death counts in articles without providing or updating the sources. For example, none of the sources in these changes (along with many more) support the updated numbers: [1], [2], [3], [4]. Celjski Grad (talk) 06:15, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bloxzge, you have edited a large number of articles on the number of injured and dead, you must remember that the dead do not count as injured. Also you don't provide sources. An example, if before there were 3 dead and 5 injured, but one of the injured dies later, then the numbers change to 4 dead and 4 injured.--Rafaelosornio (talk) 16:20, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i dont "count the dead as injured" I update things on their updated death tolls / injuries that are on the Wikipedia page of the event/s. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 17:55, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you continue to hijack sources. These include [5], [6], [7], and many others. Please respond to these and other concerns brought up by editors on your talk page. Celjski Grad (talk) 17:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"hijack sources" 🤓 more like I update things according to the Wikipedia page and source updates actually bud. So don't accuse me of hijacking sources Bloxzge 025 (talk) 17:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I gave you seven examples where you changed death/injury counts without updating the source — see above. Celjski Grad (talk) 18:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here are three examples.

In List of rampage killers you changed injuries from zero to four and left the source unchanged. The source states: "March 22, 2018 - Travis Reinking, 29, is accused of killing four people at an Antioch, Tennessee, Waffle House after walking in wearing only a green jacket and carrying an assault-type rifle." and says nothing about injuries.

In Portal:Current events/2024 July 13 you changed 20 to 22 killed and left the source unchanged. The source states: "The Palestinian Civil Defence in Gaza says 20 people are now confirmed dead"

In 2024 Hathras crowd crush you changed the death count from 123 to 124 without a source.

You cannot change numbers that are directly referenced by a source without updating the reference. If you're getting updated numbers from a source in another article then you must update the source too. Do you understand this? Celjski Grad (talk) 18:49, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bloxzge 025: Please adjust your behavior or you will be sanctioned. I'm not only talking about your sourcing, but also how you talk to your fellow editors. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 22:09, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. He just is starting to annoy me Bloxzge 025 (talk) 04:05, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of vehicle-ramming attacks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alcohol.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that you have made an edit summary or a comment that did not appear to be appropriate, civil, or otherwise constructive, and it may have been removed. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.[8] O3000, Ret. (talk) 22:11, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:12, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of terrorist incidents in 2024, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al-Shabaab.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please do not bypass redirects that are not broken. Piping links solely to avoid redirects is generally a time-wasting exercise and can actually be detrimental. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Paul_012 (talk) 04:48, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was just trying to help. I'll try not to, sorry. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 05:07, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay, please don't take it personally. I used a boilerplate message, and upon re-reading, the wording was rather unnecessarily harsh, so apologies for that. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:56, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBritinator was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023 Jet Rescue Air Ambulance Learjet 35A crash and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBritinator (talk) 18:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bloxzge 025! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBritinator (talk) 18:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I completely understand why it was declined. Making an article/draft is hard and I need some help, so thanks for offering! Have a great day! Bloxzge 025 (talk) 19:59, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:XA-IRE.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:30, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for dropping by and visiting my guestbook page. I noticed that you also changed your signature. You might think about changing it again to something else because I think there are some guidelines about having high contrast colors that are not readable or whatever. I don't know if these were like blockable rules or whatever and so maybe an admin might bug you about it or maybe not, but you could probably read up on it at WP:signatures. Thanks again for visiting my page! Huggums^{537_voted! (sign🖋️|📞talk)} 20:45, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, ignore this message. I just looked at your signature in a browser running incognito mode without any of my scripts running and I also looked at the code in your signature so I've realized there isn't anything wrong with it. The problem is that somehow the code in your signature isn't compatible with the code in one of my scripts causing it to display in a way that makes it unreadable when I run my scripts. Maybe the script can be modified to account for when people use your style, but I'm not even sure which script it is exactly yet and I don't have time to run it down right now. Sorry about the mix-up. Huggums^{537_voted! (sign🖋️|📞talk)} 21:06, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 2024 Nice arson attack requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:59, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not short anymore, so there' no reason for it's deletion Bloxzge 025 (talk) 06:12, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2024 Delta Air Lines tire explosion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS probably will not be notable beyond its short lived news cycle. although uncommon the amount of fatalities isnt notable whatsoever.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lolzer3000 (talk) 19:52, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Delta Air Lines tire explosion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Delta Air Lines tire explosion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lolzer3000 (talk) 19:56, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I was the one who expanded on the shooting paragraph. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 23:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And I'm the one expanding the article lol. Good job Bloxzge 025 (talk) 23:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You mean I expanded it? You can check through here. My authorship percentage (even though I actually didn't create the article) is 70.3%. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 00:12, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It says you didn't even edit the article in the history.. and yeah I am the one expanding it lmao, check my contributions bud.. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 00:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's the shooting article. I'm talking about the main article lol. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 01:45, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I got mixed up my bad lol Bloxzge 025 (talk) 02:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of rampage killers

added a link pointing to ABC News

List of rampage killers in Africa

added a link pointing to ABC News

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 October 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Lam Luk Ka bus crash, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 19:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2023 Jet Rescue Air Ambulance Learjet 35A crash, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ToadetteEdit (talk) 08:20, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 Jet Rescue Air Ambulance Learjet 35 crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Jet Rescue Air Ambulance Learjet 35 crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Rosbif73 (talk) 07:15, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Haiti boat fire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Haiti boat fire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 07:22, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:11, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of mass shootings in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orlando.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 November 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Quetta railway station bombing, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 00:43, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, your edit for changing the figures was reverted because the source you cited is not reachable, seems the web-url is down. If there are any other sources for the number of casualties, feel free to update with them. Thanks. MSLQr (talk) 15:58, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 Red Sea tourist boat disaster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, just wanted to let you know that at User:Bloxzge 025#My signature you've used the word "much" instead of the correct "many" (guestbooks is plural) -- Cosmic6811 🍁 (T · C) 20:09, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sanski Most school shooting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CPHA.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit on Abundant Life Christian School shooting because the citation in that sentence says "She died of an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound." If it is confirmed, can you please include a source that says so? Thanks! :) Kingturtle = (talk) 04:27, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your sources. If a source is attributed to a claim and the sources does not actually support the claim, then it cannot be include. Please stop mismatching claims with irrelevant sources. Go find sources that support the claim (if they exist) and use those instead.

Read the sources closely. They need to match up with the claim. Kingturtle = (talk) 03:26, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read the Fox article dude. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 04:54, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing it! Kingturtle = (talk) 05:54, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 Magdeburg car attack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Mirror.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Lula's Twitter account is the official one. ArionStar (talk) 03:10, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but Twitter is an app, not a source. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 03:15, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!

Hello Bloxzge 025, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. Happy editing, Abishe (talk) 23:10, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply] Thanks! Bloxzge 025 (talk) 23:52, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 23:10, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2025 New Orleans truck attack, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please do not change death and injury tolls without a source. Heythereimaguy (talk) 19:45, 1 January 2025 (UTC) Never mind, you're right. Apologies. Heythereimaguy (talk) 19:46, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

However, you should have put in the ABC News source in the text itself in order to cite the death and injury toll changes. Heythereimaguy (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to 2025 al-Funduq shooting, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you.  Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 09:48, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates#(Ready) 2025 assassination of Sharia judges in Iran, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. ExclusiveEditor _{🔔 Ping Me!} 05:11, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2025 Cetinje shootings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telegraf.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Al-Bayda gas station explosion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dailynews.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please, could you help here? ArionStar (talk) 02:33, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, with what though? Bloxzge 025 (talk) 02:35, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The community already did it. Another article here: 2025 Kartalkaya hotel fire. ArionStar (talk) 13:45, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can't do it right now but I can later. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 13:52, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Delta Connection Flight 4819 did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! SimplyLouis27 (talk) 00:32, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, no problem. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 00:32, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of terrorist incidents in 2025, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bijapur district.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Mass shootings in the United States in 2025 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 01:16, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Mass shootings in North America in 2025 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 01:16, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it please, as I created them without knowing there is already pages. My fault, sorry. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 01:39, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just for a clarification I've removed a part of your edit here, the 1,000 death toll since Thursday is the total toll, including the government forces and insurgents which were killed in clashes. Full article here, March 2025 Western Syria clashes. Massacre article only includes non-combatant deaths. Ecrusized (talk) 22:34, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 March 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2025 Jaffar Express hijacking, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)}  If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply.  06:07, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hey you put your edits in the refrences page on 2025 Somalia DHC-5 crash Grffffff (talk) 20:58, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

? Bloxzge 025 (talk) 21:02, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

you put your edits in the reference area; the stub part should be up top. Grffffff (talk) 21:07, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No? Bloxzge 025 (talk) 21:15, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

im not the one changing it. Grffffff (talk) 21:20, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2025 Trident Aviation DHC-5 crash, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Trident Aviation DHC-5 crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have moved this article to draft space because Reddit is an unreliable source and is used for a large portion of this article. The shooting itself is notable and needs an article, but the sources need some work. Can you please replace the Reddit source and use more inline citations? Thank you. Lettlre (talk) 22:19, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 April 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Mikal Mahdi, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Sam Walton (talk) 15:46, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2025 Copake Mitsubishi MU-2 crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Copake Mitsubishi MU-2 crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Carguychris (talk) 19:42, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I know that was in the Victims section already, but I thought the intro should have an update on the victims' condition since it just says they're in serious condition, which they're not. I'm new to this kind of editing, so correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks! JohnLaurens333 (need something?) 03:28, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The victims condition should be in its own section. The only thing about victims that should be in the lead is fatalities and injuries. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 03:32, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! JohnLaurens333 (need something?) 03:36, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monte Faito cable car crash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Just posting here to inform that some of the information you added here is cited to the New York Post, not The New York Times, which you included on the publisher parameter of the citations. The NYP is unreliable per Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#New York Post. ObserveOwl (talk) 12:38, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please add a reference including the url to the post, don't just say an Instagram posts exists. Thanks.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 03:33, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was just confirmed by Film Music Reporter 67.214.27.225 (talk) 11:36, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, there is currently a discussion stemming from your addition of a news item about South Korea's estimate of North Korean casualties in Ukraine on the Portal:Current events/2025 April 30 page [9]. The synopsis: your contribution was removed by another user because they allege the estimate was unproven, I restored it saying that wasn't a good reason to remove the item, but they reverted it because they said it wasn't related to another dispute that we are engaged in. While I understand you are not obliged to contribute to the discussion, it would be helpful if you did. Crwd-ppu (talk) 11:00, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the deleted content, but have added a section on the improvement of the NK soldiers which I think is worth mentioning. XYZ1233212 (talk) 17:19, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have no clue how to do it, and i asked in the talk page and got no response. could you help me out? JaxsonR (talk) 02:05, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just copy and paste it from any other attack with a number that has the same victim number as the victim figure range in the guideline section. Kinda hard to explain but that's the best I can do. (example) I copy and pasted the injured number (57) from the New Orleans truck attack onto the edit you made as in the guidelines their both in the

  

one that says 50-99. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 02:30, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ive tried that but it makes the color a smaller box within the box. JaxsonR (talk) 03:19, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Than I don't think your doing it right. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 03:20, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ill go try, but ofc not publish the edit JaxsonR (talk) 03:21, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean the Diapaga attack I've already done it. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 03:24, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thanks mate JaxsonR (talk) 03:24, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This says 14 are dead in Kentucky and 5 in Saint Louis. I ask that you please read sources beyond the headline before adding them to the article directly. Thank you. Departure– (talk) 15:03, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The source I cited does not so what are you talking about? Bloxzge 025 (talk) 15:06, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Odd. I swore it showed the Fox News source in the diff initially. Either way, this should be in the section; I'll reinstate it. Good catch. I'm not sure how the FOX source ended up in the lede. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Departure– (talk) 15:08, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2025 Shandong factory explosion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Shandong factory explosion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

XYZ1233212 (talk) 04:58, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2025 Qianxi tourist boat capsizings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Qianxi tourist boat capsizings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

XYZ1233212 (talk) 15:44, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 June 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2025 Mokwa flood, which you created and nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 00:48, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please don’t baselessly accuse editors of vandalism like you did here [[10]]. Your edit was factually incorrect and had to be corrected per WP:BLP. Mikewem (talk) 22:59, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever it is, you removed the number the FBI gave in the most recent press conference. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 00:36, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Mikewem (talk) 01:25, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bloxzge 025 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I won't do it again. Please unblock me as I edit the Portal:Current events thing and update articles, including an update I was going to do on the Boulder fire attack, every day and I won't do edit wars or whatever

Decline reason:

I'm glad to hear you won't do it again. Please sit out the rest of this block, however. -- asilvering (talk) 20:34, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Bloxzge 025 (talk) 20:13, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

When you are able to, please update your signature like so. You have two unclosed span tags.

Unclosed syntax is the most prevalent tracked error on Wikipedia and any assistance in preventing ongoing use of these in active signatures is appreciated. Thank you, Zinnober9 (talk) 00:32, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Concerning the statement of "8 deaths" in the above article I am wondering that there is just a single source (cited by you) wherein the death of the locomotive driver after the collapse in the Kursk Oblast is mentioned. In all other sources I saw only "7 deaths", all from the Bryansk Oblast. For this reason the number "8" seems doubtful. It might be useful to find more sources to the number "8". SY --Mikisavex (talk) 17:09, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RFERL is a reliable source. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 20:35, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not against RFERL but no other sources confirm "8". --Mikisavex (talk) 02:30, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SimplyLouis27. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Air India Flight 171, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. X is not a reliable source. See Talk:Air India Flight 171 for a discussion on this matter. The other sources you cited do not mention any fatality numbers. Louis (talk) (contribs) 12:24, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I clearly added an AP and BBC articles. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 12:28, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of earthquakes in 2025. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 01:58, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was just a misunderstanding. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 02:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you reverting my edits and removing content that I was the first to add? Also, you are citing Twitter instead of The Washington Post!--Hauskasic (talk) 17:23, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm citing Twitter as it comes from the Syrian Civil Defence Forces themselves. Also, the article you included says "suicide bomber" and "attacker", not two, and you are removing both of the reliable sources I added. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 17:24, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Twitter is not a reliable source.--Hauskasic (talk) 17:26, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If it comes from a reliable source it is. I will remove it anyways as I found a more recent source. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 17:27, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do not hastily revert other editors' contributions again. Please clarify any corrections you wish to make on talk pages. Hauskasic (talk) 17:29, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your saying stuff that the article didn't put so obviously I'm going to revert it. How many times do I have to tell you to stop adding information without a source? Bloxzge 025 (talk) 17:30, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What do you want from me? Are you trying to get me to stop contributing to a free encyclopedia? The source I added directly addresses what happened, while you are including unnecessary information, such as citing the civil defense labeling the attack as “terrorist” before any investigation has taken place. The Washington Post is a far more reliable source than Twitter! Hauskasic (talk) 17:34, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Calling an attack terrorism is very important. I don't really care what you do on Wikipedia I just want you to add stuff with a source. I'm not saying TWP is unreliable I'm saying your adding stuff that wasn't in the article. Also once again, the Twitter post came from a reliable source. Lastly, the article you added has stuff that's already mentioned in the free to view CTV News article while your article has a paywall. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 17:37, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your behavior does not suggest a willingness to collaborate with others here. Your attitude comes across as self-centered and unconstructive. Hauskasic (talk) 17:38, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Than leave me alone. I'm not trying to be rude your just being annoying and I have clearly stated my reasons why I think you are. Let's stop arguing and move on. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 17:39, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It’s clear who’s being disruptive, given the number of blocks you’ve recently received. The fact that a source is not freely accessible is not a valid reason for its removal. Educate yourself before engaging in edit wars. Hauskasic (talk) 17:46, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying it should be removed cause it's behind a paywall I'm saying you should find a free source. Don't bring up my past with a red link user... Like I said already, move on instead of arguing. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 17:48, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop the personal attacks. This is your final warning. Your behavior is not appropriate for Wikipedia! Hauskasic (talk) 17:52, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You’ve gone too far, and something needs to be done to stop you! Hauskasic (talk) 17:54, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, I'll stop reverting your edit's now since I don't like to argue. Stop acting like I'm some kind of movie villan. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 17:54, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not attacking you lol. If anything, we both are. Here, I will stop conflicting with you. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 17:54, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hauskasic, instead of working against each other, why don't we both work together to improve the article? Bloxzge 025 (talk) 18:02, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, that’s what I was hoping for. I had no ill intentions toward you. Hauskasic (talk) 18:05, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Sorry for the arguing. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 18:06, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see that your aggressive behavior is directed solely at my contributions. You are the one who caused all this disruption. Instead of building upon the report I added, you created a new version of the news as if my contribution was unworthy of attention. Change your attitude, and you will be accepted! Hauskasic (talk) 18:03, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I already said why don't we work together to improve the article. If you don't want to, that's fine, but I'm done with arguing. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 18:05, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 June 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Richard Gerald Jordan, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 08:13, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Bloxzge 025, hope all is well. I've undone your addition for Current events/2025 June 26 because you used the deprecated source of The Epoch Times.
Just noting for the future, thanks for your contributions! Best, Zinderboff (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Please read again the USGS log for the earthquake. It is clear @Filipinohere wrote the wrong date. Furthermore 23:00 UTC is equivalent to 7AM the next day here in the Philippines. And please be reminded that we use USGS statistics as much as possible except in very limited circumstances. Borgenland (talk) 01:44, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bloxzge_025 reported by User:Dahawk04 (Result: ). Thank you. Dahawk04 (talk) 17:15, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted it because it deleted information. You can add it back if you want I was just trying to make an edit. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 17:33, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, one of those edits was me reverting my own as the person who said it corrected himself. Can you not bring up past incidents from a while ago? It's like your trying to get me banned or something. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 17:35, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The other edits I've reverted is because they were fine before or had grammar errors. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 17:36, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 20:18, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will add that repeatedly removing red links is a really silly reason to get yourself blocked for this again. You do not seem to be an ill-tempered person, but this is getting to be a competence issue that will, if there is a next time, likely get you blocked indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:18, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please stop removing red links as you've done repeatedly at 2025 Coeur d'Alene shooting. If you'd like to understand why, you could read the edit history and the notes people left you when they were adding those back, but for now, WP:REDYES should suffice. You should also consider WP:BRD when editing, and if you are reverted, take your changes to the talk page to gain consensus if you really think your changes should be made. In so far as bolded text goes, please see MOS:BOLDREDIRECT which covers bolding a redirect target at the target article similar to what is done at this same article. You should probably refrain from significant editing until you're more clear about what is acceptable in articles and what is not. —Locke Cole • t • c 20:16, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 2025 Northern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa floods requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Darconis (talk) 14:16, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2025 Kut shopping mall fire, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:25, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grand Sierra Resort shooting, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Sierra Resort shooting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2025 Air Kasaï Antonov An-2 crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Air Kasaï Antonov An-2 crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

XYZ1233212 (talk) 16:05, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have added quite extensive erroneous information with Oxford Properties and fake information about the Scarborough Town Centre. I want to know why?

Why? Why? Why? Why?

Your Intentions are NOT sincere

We note that the information provided in your entries is completely different from the information provided in previous VERSIONS of the wikipedia page.

To ensure that you meet the obligations under REGARDING THE CRIMINAL CODE ON STEALING LAND AND SCARBOROUGH MALLS FROM CADILLAC FAIRVIEW and (i), please provide clear, accurate, and truthful details about the lobbying activities you are undertaking, including the outcomes you are seeking. .

As this will be the 1ST time you substantially modify THE WIKIPEDIA PAGE, and do not incorporate our guidance in such changes, failure to provide the necessary information about your lobbying activities, per the requirements of the Act, may result in the rejection of your registration.

YOU HAVE ADDED QUITE EXTENSIVE FAKE INFORMATION WITH OXFORD PROPERTIES AND FAKE INFORMATION ABOUT THE SCARBOROUGH TOWN CENTRE. I WANT TO KNOW WHY? THE CITY OF TORONTO IS IN THE PROCESS OR EXPROPRIATING THE LAND.

WHY ARE YOU ADDING SO MUCH FAKE INFORMATION ABOUT OXFORD PROPERTIES, ETC. 70.50.40.17 (talk) 03:03, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford properties? what are you talking about? also, the shooting at the town centre was not false. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 03:05, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ohnoitsjamie I see you have blocked this user before, do you have any idea what they are talking about? Bloxzge 025 (talk) 03:07, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. An edit war occurs when two or more users begin repeatedly reverting content on an page in a back-and-forth fashion to restore it back to how they think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree with their changes. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or undo the edits made by other editors when your changes are reverted. Instead, please use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. The best practice at this time is to stop editing the page and to discuss the disagreements, issues, and concerns at-hand with the other editors involved in the dispute. Wikipedia provides a page that helps to detail how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard, or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection while the discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

Continuing to engage in further edit warring behavior can result in being blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your demeanor, behavior, or conduct indicate that you intend to continue repeatedly making reverts on the page. Astrawiki3203 (talk) 21:33, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have already stopped reverting your edits. I don't feel like I want to continue to argue. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 21:34, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You read my edit before you reverted it, yeah? ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" _(hihi) 23:05, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted it. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 23:06, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You reported Astrawiki3203 for edit warring, but failed to notify them. You must notify a user when reporting them with the AN3-notice template. You should not fret about receiving personal attacks when doing so because that would be counted against them, not you. Raskuly (talk) 23:49, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will now. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 23:57, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I already did it. Raskuly (talk) 23:59, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay. Thanks! Bloxzge 025 (talk) 23:59, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed that most of your recent edits, including edits to Evergreen High School (Colorado), did not include an edit summary. Another person asked you in February 2025 to use edit summaries (User_talk:Bloxzge_025#February_2025). You can review your history here: https://xtools.wmcloud.org/editsummary/en.wikipedia.org/Bloxzge_025. Please take care to summarize each and every edit you make, especially on mainspace articles related to current events. This is very helpful to other editors as we work together to build an encyclopedia. Thank you! Dreamyshade (talk) 04:00, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bloxzge 025: Just wanted to ask again, since your subsequent edits to Killing of Charlie Kirk did not include edit summaries. See WP:LISTENTOUS. Please take the time to briefly explain your edits in edit summaries. Dreamyshade (talk) 16:49, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bloxzge 025: I see that you continue to edit other articles without including edit summaries, and without acknowledging my requests. Please see Wikipedia:Communication is required. Dreamyshade (talk) 02:28, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. I always forget. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 20:13, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bloxzge 025 Try checking the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Dreamyshade (talk) 04:14, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bloxzge 025 Hi! I see you continue to not include edit summaries for some of your edits. Can you commit to including edit summaries for your edits? Please see Wikipedia:FIES: "According to the policy on consensus, all edits should be explained (unless the reason for them is obvious)—either by clear edit summaries, or by discussion on the associated talk page." There is additional guidance on that page, including WP:EDITSUMCITE. Dreamyshade (talk) 16:48, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Raskuly (talk) 23:55, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to remember. If you check my recent edits you seen most have them. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 00:33, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bloxzge 025! Your additions to 2025 Mogadishu prison attack have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 10:54, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, what was copyrighted? Bloxzge 025 (talk) 13:08, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Content was a match for prose found here and here. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:44, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't add the see news one. As for the Associated Press one, my bad. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 15:27, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For writing 2025 Accurate Energetic Systems explosion. 123957a (talk) 05:32, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You cited this guideline while reverting my edit, which is also the entire reason I added the red link in the first place. See the line Add red links to articles to indicate that a page will be created soon or that an article should be created for the topic because the subject is notable and verifiable? Per the list at State bureau of investigation, it seems likely that the Mississippi State Bureau of Investigation warrants an article, which I did check before adding the red link. Raskuly (talk) 18:10, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know that I've reverted a few of your edits on 2025 Delhi car explosion, and undid the page move, as you did not provide reliable sources referring to it as a bombing or attack, nor could I find any. Grumpylawnchair (talk) 23:18, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BNO News is reliable? also, ANI and FW also reported that. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 23:30, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It would be helpful if you could provide links. Grumpylawnchair (talk) 23:32, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The one for ANI is https://aninews.in/news/national/general-news/delhi-blast-police-register-case-under-uapa-explosives-act20251111035713/. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 23:34, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That says they registered a case under the Explosives Act, not that it was an explosion. Grumpylawnchair (talk) 23:37, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I read it off of this post https://x.com/AZ_Intel_/status/1988003673398800662 by a reliable news account on Twitter. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 23:40, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:RSPTWITTER, Twitter is generally not a reliable source, and there are no indications that this account is reliable. Regardless, I would wait for several other sources to classify it as such before making such a drastic change. Grumpylawnchair (talk) 23:43, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2025 Dagestan Kamov Ka-226 crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Dagestan Kamov Ka-226 crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

11WB (talk) 18:00, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was confused by your addition of this obviously dubious information to the ITN portal. It was very easy to see that it was not real. Did you check anywhere else before adding it? Please be careful before adding such plainly false information to the ITN portal. Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 12:08, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I seen it on ASN but it later got removed. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 13:02, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that next time you spend a couple minutes verifying with a reliable source (ASN isn't one) instead of wasting your time and that of others by adding false information to ITN Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 13:17, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. My bad. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 13:18, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nari Air Flight 114, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ktkvtsh (talk) 03:13, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nari Air Flight 114, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nari Air Flight 114 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 December 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2025 Taipei stabbings, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 21:26, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 December 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Harmony Jets Flight 185, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 18:23, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 December 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2025 Oaxaca train derailment, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 15:48, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 January 2026, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2026 Crans-Montana explosion, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:40, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:December 2025 in Ethiopia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 00:21, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I create the Yeison Jimenez crash 4 minutes before you did and i did not know you made it. Grffffff (talk) 00:56, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Well can you delete it? Bloxzge 025 (talk) 00:57, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I removed everything but i think a deletion form is required Grffffff (talk) 00:58, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Not trying to be rude or anything but mine has more information. Thanks for trying to help out. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 01:00, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Not rude Grffffff (talk) 01:01, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Can you put a deletion form on the page Grffffff (talk) 01:02, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 01:05, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:January 2026 in Nepal indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:39, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2026 Paipa Piper PA-31 crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2026 Paipa Piper PA-31 crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

11WB (talk) 14:18, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

On 14 January 2026, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2026 Sikhio train disaster, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 21:43, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 January 2026, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2026 Adamuz train derailments, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – robertsky (talk) 14:57, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2026 disasters in Thailand indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:03, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Bullying?. IndigoManedWolf (talk) 01:13, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 January 2026, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2026 Biobío wildfires, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 07:55, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited January 2026 North American winter storm, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (state) was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your heavy contribution! Megabyte21 (talk) 07:43, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

To what? Bloxzge 025 (talk) 17:07, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

2026 Baramati Learjet 45 crash, just saying thanks for the insightful information. :) Megabyte21 (talk) 20:16, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! thanks for saying thanks lol. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 20:17, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the edit saying no survivors. I saw it last second and went back to revert. You reverted it when i did Grffffff (talk) 21:40, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2025 Samaritan's Purse Cessna 208 hijacking, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Samaritan's Purse Cessna 208 hijacking (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I have reverted your recent edits on Perimeter Aviation Flight 993 since they were copyright violations from the Transportation Safety Board of Canada (and also poorly formatted). According to the Transportation Safety Board of Canada's copyright policy, commercial use of their content is prohibited (without permission) and is incompatible with the CC-BY-SA policy on Wikipedia. Their Flickr images all have a CC BY-NC-ND license, so their text is likely also incompatible in the same way. I do appreciate your work and expansion of articles like this, but please keep in mind copyright restrictions. Thanks!. RandomInfinity17 (talk - contributions) 23:21, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 2025 Samanthas Purse DC-3 hijacking has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 13 § 2025 Samanthas Purse DC-3 hijacking until a consensus is reached. Rosbif73 (talk) 08:06, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Yeison_Jim%C3%A9nez#Merge_proposal

You commented, but never officially voted. Zaptain United (talk) 14:49, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I don't like to vote in deletion nominations or merge proposals about my own articles. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 17:13, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

alright I understand Zaptain United (talk) 17:14, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2026 Cedarbluff shootings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2026 Cedarbluff shootings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Raskuly (talk) 20:21, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello i was wondering if you could sign my guestbook, your an editor i look up too CharlieRidesRollerCoasters (talk) 03:12, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. But why do you look up to me lol. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 03:13, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You edit a lot of the same stuff i like to edit lol CharlieRidesRollerCoasters (talk) 03:15, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 03:48, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 February 2026, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Eric Dane, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 02:48, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]