Article milestones Date Process Result February 4, 2012 Peer review Reviewed
	Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 8, 2009, September 8, 2010, and September 8, 2012.

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Star Trek Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Television: American High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American television task force. United States: Television Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Top-importance). Science Fiction High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future: How the Space Shuttles were given better names thanks to Star Trek (BBC News)

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 3.

The articles name should be „star trek“ and nothing else. That is the actual name of the series like its mentioned in the title screen. The addition „the original series“ should not be there because it is not part of the actual title mentioned in the opening. The title screen should be the only source for this, because it IS the title screen. Wikipedia should list the names of things truthfuly and not some nickname from fans or stuff like that. A mention of the addition can be done in the article text somewhere as some kind of info, but not in the article title itself.

Furthermore the article for the franchise „star trek“ should have the addition „(franchise)“ to distinguish itself from the more older series called „star trek“. 2003:C8:6F25:EE00:BF19:5A5:EBC2:68F9 (talk) 20:43, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. Paramount has taken on "The Original Series" as part of the official title (it is no longer a "nickname from fans." Official releases of home media, as well as other licensed products contain the subtitle "The Original Series." Rcarter555 (talk) 20:56, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When you actually watch an episode, what does the title say at the beginning? 2600:4040:5D38:1600:3CD0:A422:6098:B251 (talk) 14:04, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While Paramount haven't quite reached George Lucas "Star Wars -> Star Wars: Episode IV – A New Hope" levels of retconning the title, the official website, along with a majority of reliable sources all refer to the series as Star Trek: The Original Series. Accordingly our article follows this per WP:COMMONNAME. Sideswipe9th (talk) 19:43, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agree that it should simply be Star Trek. Paramount paid to have the entire series upgraded, yet did not change the onscreen title to include "The Original Series." This is very similar to what Paramount did with Raiders of the Lost Ark, which almost nobody calls "Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark" despite that title being on the covers of all new discs. Yet they did not also change the onscreen title. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎2603:8000:7800:9f15:bc76:f540:f3af:ac09 (talk) 20:50, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paramount did what it did because idiot fans can't keep their Star Treks straight. Vincent Ree (talk) 15:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Under this heading in the article, there's nothing about "Games" or "Gaming" and there are quite a few out there. I think there should be some kind of acknowledgement of this 'genre.' 2600:8800:395:B000:B528:C7D4:72A8:DBD8 (talk) 20:43, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://x.com/WilliamShatner/status/1909959257753358797

It’s called Presentism and it was used wreak havoc on history several years ago when statues were torn down, books were banned and things renamed to prove how progressive the world had become. Just listen to my opening monologue on Star Trek TOS on Paramount+. They intentionally garbled it on every episode because I say “where no man has gone before” That’s Presentism at its finest hour.

R5Y93mdf (talk) 03:33, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Clarification: the above text is R5Y93mdf reporting something William Shatner said on X, not something R5Y93mdf says himself) --Cambalachero (talk) 03:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's just a poor sound transfer... it's not "Presentism" or censorship or whatever else. Spanneraol (talk) 03:51, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Being the main actor who says this, it should be relevant to be mentioned, here or in the Where no man has gone before article --Cambalachero (talk) 04:00, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Still doesn't make it notable unless you can find any actual evidence that anything of the sort was intentionally done otherwise it's just him trying to make a political statement which isn't relevant here. Spanneraol (talk) 04:05, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need evidence that something is "right" in order to quote it, only that the man making the quote is relevant for his opinion to be quoted. And the lead actor of a TV series, having an opinion of a change made to that series in re-runs, that is relevant (it's almost a textbook definition of being relevant), regardless of the opinion being "political" or whatnot. Cambalachero (talk) 13:09, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We don't have any evidence that such a change was even made.. and not everything a former actor of a show has to say about the show is relevant. I don't see any reliable sources reporting on this. Spanneraol (talk) 13:33, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have Paramount+ and just looked at the opening titles for episodes from all 3 seasons. Absolutely nothing is garbled. An encyclopedia sole function is to present the facts and the facts don't support anything that Shatner is claiming. The whole thing should be ignored. SonOfThornhill (talk) 14:02, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

R5Y93mdf now blocked as a sock. Doug Weller talk 15:10, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article states that "In 1983, Leonard Nimoy hosted a one-hour special as a promotional tie-in with the film Star Trek III: The Search for Spock," however, ST3 did not come out until 1984. I believe the tie in was for ST2 which had been released on Home Video. That's why it was paired with a re-airing of 'Space Seed'. SonOfThornhill (talk) 13:06, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While the special was produced in 1983 it was not released on television until 1984 to coincide with Star Trek III. The ST2 video release was at the end of 1982 so they wouldn't run a tie-in project two years later. Spanneraol (talk) 15:27, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]