Talk:Liberalism in Romania

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liberalism and radicalism in Romania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 31 October 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 05:36, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Liberalism and radicalism in Romania → Liberalism in Romania – Shorter, more concise. Current title feels original research, do sources discuss Romanian liberalism always next to radicalism? It doesn't seem so [1]. Furthermore, Classical radicalism states on its own article that it is in fact a subset of liberalism, and most of this article deals with ("mainstream"? "standard"? "non-radical"?) liberalism anyway, not with radicalism. I believe this proposed title is more appropriate and simpler and that it does not even narrow the article's scope. The move would also make this article consistent with most articles at Template:Liberalism in Europe. Super Ψ Dro 18:45, 31 October 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 02:41, 8 November 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 01:29, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Dahn, who moved this article from the title I am proposing here to the current one (19 years ago [2]). They most definitively have valuable insight to offer. Super Ψ Dro 18:49, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My original request reflected the standard nomenclature of that time for countries that have also had a radical (yes, classical radical) tradition -- this is under-discussed in this article still, but think C. A. Rosetti and George Panu. I don't have any definitive option or opinion on which title is best, but I think it would be best that we either shorten it to just "Liberalism" for all countries, assuming that radicalism is a subset of liberalism, or keep "and radicalism" for all countries where there was also a radical movement, in the classical sense. If the latter, Romania would qualify. Dahn (talk) 18:58, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Romania has been notified of this discussion. TarnishedPathtalk 02:42, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
allikas: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Liberalism_and_radicalism_in_Romania