This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Japan Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks.JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Japan to do list: Peer review: None A-class review: None Featured content candidates –  Articles: None Pictures: None Lists: None Good article nominations: Add requested images to articles that need them. Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions. Improve and expand Japan-related stubs. Create some requested articles. Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English. Assess unassessed articles Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips Military history: Aviation / Maritime / Asian / Japanese / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force Maritime warfare task force Asian military history task force Japanese military history task force World War II task force Shipwrecks Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Shipwreck-related priority open tasks: To Do Lady Elizabeth (1879) Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed! Improve grammar Add any additions if needed Still adding more information Discuss desired additions -None Asian Month This article was submitted or expanded as part of the 2015 edition of Wikipedia Asian Month.Asian MonthWikipedia:WikiProject Asian MonthTemplate:WikiProject Asian MonthAsian Month

As this ship and Nitta Maru are the same ship, Nitta Maru should be merged here. Please comment. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 02:31, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Similar merge discussion at Talk:Kasuga Maru D O N D E groovily Talk to me 02:33, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, just be sure to use a civilian merchant ship career infobox in addition to the military one.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:25, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Japanese aircraft carrier Chūyō/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 12:10, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Will start soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 12:10, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• No DAB links Y
• No dead links Y
• No copyvio Y

• " first of her class of three passenger-cargo liners built in Japan during the late 1930s." Might want to add "she was the".
  • I think, grammatically, only "the" is necessary there.
• @Sturmvogel 66: That's all my suggestions. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 21:11, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Iazyges: - Sturm has been away for some time now, so I took the liberty of fixing the issue you raised above. Thanks. Parsecboy (talk) 11:45, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Parsecboy: If you feel like doing Talk:King George V-class battleship (1911)/GA1, it's open as well. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 01:01, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    • Yeah, I might take care of that one too - will see how much time I have today. Parsecboy (talk) 09:54, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]