Talk:Grindhouse (film)

Former good articleGrindhouse (film) was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 7, 2007Good article nomineeListed
September 28, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
June 16, 2025Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

The redirect Plannet terror has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 10 § Plannet terror until a consensus is reached. Regards, SONIC678 20:28, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:56, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article has not been properly maintained since its promotion to GA more than 15 years ago. Lead is thin for an article with 34,994 characters and doesn't adequately summarize key points of the film's production history, prose in most sections suffer from heavy quoting, with a whopping 86.2% copyvio detected, and some claims may be unsourced due to lack of in-text citations. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 05:03, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.