This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Serial, mass, and spree killers / Organized crime / Terrorism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of crime and criminal biography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Serial Killer task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Organized crime task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Low-importance). United States: Government Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance). Military history: Technology / North America / United States This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force North American military history task force United States military history task force Politics: American Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance). Disaster management Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Entries are needed for Black Liberation Army, Weather Underground, and May 19 Communist Organization, among others. Will try to get to it sometime soon. PDGPA (talk) 23:35, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As per an RFC there is no community consensus to call January 6 United States Capitol attack as Terrorism as per this RFC .Hence it should not added this page. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:16, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What would count as a consensus? That RFC you linked had at least 63 said yes, at least 42 said no, and at least 24 said wait. 2603:6011:9600:52C0:9804:53F7:C76F:B6F8 (talk) 02:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the first line of the summary of that RfC closure? --ZimZalaBim ^talk 03:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• That consensus doesn't apply here, per WP:CONLOCAL. It is loosely indicative that a discussion held here might reach the same result, but it applies only to the page where it was held. Even beyond that, a no-consensus outcome isn't binding in either direction (outside of WP:BLP issues), and the closing rationale focused heavily on how it was a bad RFC; that's not a consensus that tells us what to do even on that page, let alone anywhere else. --Aquillion (talk) 12:25, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  So in the absence of certainty, why should we declare the affirmative? Tooli Mars (talk) 17:02, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Would like to add the following Entry to the list:

The 2017 Las Vegas shooting, considered the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history, took place on October 1, 2017, when a gunman, Stephen Paddock, opened fire from the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay hotel onto a crowd of concertgoers attending the Route 91 Harvest music festival. The attack left 58 people dead and over 850 injured, including 411 from gunfire, in a span of 10 minutes. Paddock, a 64-year-old retiree, had stockpiled an arsenal of firearms, including semi-automatic rifles modified with bump stocks to increase their rate of fire. He fired over 1,000 rounds before taking his own life as law enforcement breached his hotel room. Despite an extensive investigation, authorities were unable to determine a clear motive for Paddock’s actions, and he had no known ties to terrorist groups or criminal activities. The incident prompted renewed debates about gun control, mental health, and public safety measures within the United States.

Original Article:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Las_Vegas_shooting Tngumbo (talk) 21:12, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Given that terrorism is defined as being motivated by some sort of ideological goals, I don't believe the 2017 Las Vegas shooting would merit inclusion, as the gunman's motive was never determined. – Recoil16 (talk) 21:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This week's executive order by President Trump designated anti-fascist activist groups in the USA as a domestic terrorist organization on grounds that they are "a militarist, anarchist enterprise that explicitly calls for the overthrow of the United States Government, law enforcement authorities, and our system of law." Does that count for this article? Damian Yerrick (talk) 20:45, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

should be added, I will add it PhilovGraves (talk) 14:21, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And I removed it. Antifa is not an organisation nor terrorist. It hasn't committed domestic terrorism. Read the lead. This claim doesn't belong here. Doug Weller talk 14:57, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Simonm223 (talk) 17:27, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They absolutely do belong here. They are a funded left wing group, have committed crimes, have been sent to jail by courts, and now the federal government lists them as a domes to terrorist organization. Cannot let your personal politics get in the way of reality.

https://www.courthousenews.com/judge-sentences-protesters-in-san-diego-antifa-case-to-up-to-two-years-in-jail/ ~2025-37216-75 (talk) 06:52, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Funded? Who funded them? Reaity is that they aren't an organised group no matter what the judge says, and the rest of the article says "Antifa — short for “anti-fascist” — is a catch-all term for a loose assortment of left-wing protesters with no central leadership or membership structure who share an opposition to authoritarianism and ethnic, sexual, gender and religious-based discrimination.

A CBS report cited by Congress says “antifa is not a highly organized movement” but rather “a loose affiliation of local activists scattered across the United States and a few other countries.” Also don't forget Trump cannot designate any group as a domestic terrorist organisation.[https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq5j085207do] Doug Weller talk 08:29, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You need to have some basis for your comments, not baseless opinion. It's nice to have opinions, but they cannot be foundationless, lest they be taken as silly. Royal2Real (talk) 12:01, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This editor is now blocked. Doug Weller talk 15:19, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please change the linked article for 764 from the year 764 to the article for the group 764. The link in question is in the "764 and No Lives Matter" subsection within the "Terrorist organizations" section. ~2025-43797-74 (talk) 21:25, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Nice catch. FMRadio :3_{(chat | edits | she/her)} 22:01, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]