Bijeljina massacre was one of the Warfare good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 2, 2017, April 2, 2018, April 2, 2021, April 2, 2024, and April 2, 2025.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
Bijeljina massacre is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Yugoslavia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Yugoslavia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YugoslaviaWikipedia:WikiProject YugoslaviaTemplate:WikiProject YugoslaviaYugoslavia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
This article was copy edited by Drcrazy102, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 19 November 2015.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of crime and criminal biography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Since April 2024, the article has had several "citation needed" notifications in the lead and the body.
It also uses several primary sources from the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. A significant part of the article is actually based on these primary sources, which goes against WP:Primary.
The primary source is the best source for its own contents; however, it is evident that undue weight was given to the primary sources. They are used as a source for significant information within the article. They act as a secondary source for the events instead of just being used for what they are—a statement from the ICTY judgement.
As to the "lead section should not contain any citations" being an ironclad rule, please see the statements in Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section in the lead: "A lead section should be carefully sourced as appropriate, although it is common for citations to appear in the body and not the lead." And see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section#Citations which states in part: "Because the lead usually repeats information that is in the body, editors should balance the desire to avoid redundant citations in the lead with the desire to aid readers in locating sources for challengeable material. Although the presence of citations in the lead is neither required in every article nor prohibited in any article, there is no exception to citation requirements specific to leads. The necessity for citations in a lead should be determined on a case-by-case basis by editorial consensus. Complex, current, or controversial subjects may require many citations; others, few or none."
I have not thoroughly reviewed the article and am not expressing a view on the merits of the reassessment. I comment only to note that the use or not of citations in the lead is judged on a case by case basis. While perhaps discouraged, citations in the lead are not prohibited and in at least some cases may be needed. Since whether there should be citations in the lead is a judgment call on a case-by-case basis, not an ironclad rule, it should be an editorial matter between interested editors, not a basis for GAR. That being said, thanks for bringing this article up for attention. A quick glance leads me to think that a review and possibly some improvements are needed. Donner60 (talk) 01:12, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Since I am working on several other GARs and other projects, I do not have time to review this in depth promptly. A quick scan shows there are almost no citation needed tags left in the article and one or two problematic tagged citations are covered by an additional citation. I was looking at articles that I thought I might be able to improve to stay at GA. I saw this "no citations in the lead" comment and knew it was wrong. In fact a citation in the lead often can cover a mention later in the article if the point is mentioned without further elaboration and doesn't end a paragraph. (Any citation problems that still exist need to be fixed, of course.)
The "undue weight" to or overuse of primary sources is a judgment call, depending on the source, whether there may be other sources available for key information and how the primary sources are used and described, and whether any contrary views or explanations are given in reliable secondary sources. So again, this is not necessarily a reason for downgrading. As I noted, it would take me some weeks to get back to this in depth.
So even though I think that neither reason given for the downgrade is a good one in every case, and the first is not a good one in this case, I cannot say definitively that the second one on primary sources is not a good reason for delist in this case. The bottom line, then, is that I cannot in good faith object to a delist (unless I, as time permits, or someone else familiar with the article or subject matter gives it a thorough review and sees reason to object, which I suppose is doubtful). Donner60 (talk) 23:29, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
