This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Serbia Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Africa: Angola Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Angola. International relations This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I've written many stubs on bilateral relations, but these relations do not pass WP:GNG. Rather than nominate it for deletion, I suggest we simply merge the one sentence which is not already included in the various foreign relations articles. Where are the multiple independent sources?--TM 22:51, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if that is really needed, i will find them. I am from those people that think that international bilateral relation is WP:N by it self. But i will try to expand it a bit. --WhiteWriter ^speaks 22:59, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As you know, that is not the consensus opinion. Considering the distance, relatively small size of both economies and lack of historic interaction, it is best to merge the content than have many small articles which will never be expanded beyond 2 or 3 sentences.--TM 23:08, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but i really disagree with you. Never? How can we know. Even now i have material to expand it quite a bit. Angola and Serbia agree to strengthen cooperation, Jeremić: Angola - prilika za srpske firme, Angola: Serbia Might Help Rehabilitate Air Force Base, Military training to top Angola-Serbia cooperation, Angola Defence, economic matters top President's meeting with Serbian minister ... Please, give me some time to fix this, and you will see that we have reasons to leave it. OK? I will give you cakes? :) --WhiteWriter ^speaks 23:35, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]