This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Rugby union This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Someone's going to have to do a lot of work to explain how the attendance info isn't complete WP:FANCRUFT. Here's your opportunity. Go... – PeeJay 10:48, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1. I don't have to 'justify' anything to you, PJ. No-one died and made you God of rugby wiki. Mind you tone, and dial all the way back on the bigoted disablist rhetoric while you're about it or we're going to take this to another place #uncivil

2. Average, highest and lowest attendances in professional sports leagues are commonly recorded information in multiple similar articles - including the main United Rugby Championship article

3. Simply asserting 'cruft' does not make it so, it's vandalism-like behaviour. If you have an argument for its removal for unimportance, make it, but don't edit war to getting your own way, you don't own the article, and it's bullying.

Mpjmcevoybeta (talk) Mpjmcevoybeta (talk) 11:50, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You'll get nowhere by claiming that this sort of information exists in other articles on Wikipedia. If anything, that just gives me other pages to remove it from. Explain: why is it not cruft? Go! – PeeJay 13:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]